2002-04-02 P & Z - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Ms. Moore-Sykes explained that Staff is having an issue with winter construction and indicated that all requirements for occupancy are met with the exception of the driveways. She then asked whether the Commission would consider putting a requirement in the Ordinance that Class 5 must be installed prior to passing the footing inspection in order to eliminate this type of issue. Mr. Palzer commented he felt that type of language should be put in the developer’s agreement. Council Member Travis indicated that a previous Council had determined that every development would escrow an amount to include a silt fence and gravel drive on every lot but that was misinterpreted and is not being done. It was the consent of the Commission to ask that the developer’s agreements contain the language governing the gravel drives. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Ken had said that attached garages were defined as an accessory structure and asked that it be fixed. The Commission asked Ms. Moore-Sykes to have Ken locate the error in the Ordinance so it could be fixed if need be. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated Ken had asked the Commission to consider allowing fences on the property line without requiring signatures. The Commission indicated it had no interest in allowing fences on property lines without signatures. The Commission indicated it would like to hold the public hearing on Ordinance #4 at the June meeting. VI. NEW BUSINESS 1. Ordinance #3-B – Curfew City of Centerville a.City of Circle Pines (Anoka County) b.City of Lexington c.City of Hermantown d.City of Aitkin Chair Hansen indicated there may be an issue with curfew at Waterworks because of the teen nights. It was the consent of the Commission to ask Staff to discuss the curfew Ordinance with Waterworks to make them aware of the potential issue with teen nights. Page 7 of 10