Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and Council <br />City of Centerville, Minnesota <br />We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major <br />fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of Centerville, Minnesota (the City), as of and for the year ended <br />December 31, 2010, which collectively comprise the City’s basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These <br />financial statements are the responsibility of the City’s management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial <br />statements based on our audit. The prior year comparative information has been derived from the City’s 2009 financial statements <br />and, in our report dated May 19, 2010, we expressed unqualified opinions on the respective proprietary fund financial statements. <br /> <br />We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those <br />standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are <br />free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in <br />the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by <br />management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable <br />basis for our opinions. <br /> <br />In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of <br />the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the <br />City as of December 31, 2010, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof and the <br />respective budgetary comparison for the General fund for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally <br />accepted in the United States of America. <br /> <br />Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the Management’s Discussion and Analysis <br />on pages 13 through 23, and the Schedule of Funding Progress on page 75 be presented to supplement the basic financial <br />statements. Such information, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting <br />Standards Board, who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an <br />appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required <br />supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which <br />consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for <br />consistency with management’s responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained <br />during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information <br />because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. <br /> <br />-9- <br /> <br />