My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-05-04 P & R Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2011
>
2011-05-04 P & R Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2011 9:53:58 AM
Creation date
4/28/2011 3:20:02 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- - - <br /> Parks & Recreation Committee <br /> Meeting Minutes 04-06-11 <br /> insurance, St. Paul Water Utilities permit and subject to DNR approval if necessary. Ayes — 6, <br /> � Nays — 0, Abstain —1(Amundsen). Motion Carried. <br /> The club has offered to help landscape the area to any degree the committee would like, but they don't <br /> necessarily need to do anything with the shoreline at this time. Trimming of some of the lower branches <br /> ' of trees on the property may need to be done, but that will be determined if the project moves forward. <br /> Mr. Dallas Larson & Mr. Paul Palzer. Cornerstone Park Fonntain <br /> Committee Member Seeley reported to the coxnmittee she had talked to Mr. Larson and Mr. Palzer prior <br /> to the committee meeting regarding some concerns from the Parks & Recreation Committee's perspective <br /> on the upcoming Trail Project. <br /> 1. The City, the Parks Committee, Bonestroo, and Veit a11 have the same understanding of what <br /> "fountain ready" looks like for the Cornerstone Park. The committee was under the impression <br /> from Mr. Mark Statz, City Engineer that while the fountain itself was removed from the project, <br /> the footings, electricity and plumbing would be installed so nothing would have to be ripped up at <br /> a later time when the committee had funding to install the fountain. <br /> 2. The City is not paying $30,000 for landscaping that could potentially be done with volunteer <br /> hours. <br /> 3. The committee felt $10,000 was too high for one informational kiosk. <br /> Both Mr. Larson and Mr. Palzer said they would look into the concerns, especially the specifics behind I <br /> what can be expected for "fountain ready". Mr. Larson reported that the plans for Cornerstone Park <br /> show ornamental plantings around the perimeter of the park, the kiosk, the colored concrete with the I <br /> message engraved `May Peace Prevail On Earth' in 4 languages and a round area where the fountain <br /> would be that is basically a planting bed for now. The original plan called for an expansive footing j <br /> system, but this was not included in the final plan, neither were electricity or plumbing. Mr. Palzer said <br /> there is an electrical box in the area that serves all the street lights, but no electrical work was included in <br /> the bid. There is nothing bazring us from getting electric and water to the site at a later date. Mr. Larson ' <br /> and Mr. Palzer had done research on pre-fabricated fountains and presented the committee with some <br /> ideas that would be more economical and require fewer footings or no footings at all. <br /> Committee Member Amundsen was concerned about the flat stainless steel grates included in the original <br /> plan for Mill Road. These were to be installed across resident's driveways. The committee specifically <br /> requested high domed ones as the flat or smaTler dome ones filI up with leaves and back up water. Mr. <br /> Statz said the plan would be changed to reflect the larger dome ones. The current plan calls for smaller <br /> dome ones. Mr. Palzer said he would look into this and talk to the contractor about changing them. <br /> The kiosk is in the plan, even though Committee Member Seeley was under the impression it was <br /> removed. The location of the kiosk was moved in the alternate plan, but it is still included in the project <br /> as it is a requirement of the grant. There is not flexibility in making changes to the contract because it is <br /> a federal project. <br /> The original plan had approximately $30,000 of landscaping included in the plan. Staff and the Parks & <br /> Recreation Committee objected to this plan as too expensive, as well as we do not have the staff to care <br /> for an additional planting of that size. The project was scaled back by Bonestroo, but still contains <br /> significantly more plantings than was expected. The plantings were left in the plan, but the irrigation <br /> � 3 of 8 <br /> � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.