My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011-07-05 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2011
>
2011-07-05 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2011 8:08:57 AM
Creation date
6/29/2011 8:08:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF CENTERVILLE <br /> PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <br /> June 7, 2011 <br /> Pursuant to due ca11 and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held its regularly <br /> meeting on May 3, 2011, at 6:30 p.m. <br /> PRESENT: Chairperson Darrin Mosher <br /> Commissioner James Flint <br /> Commissioner Eric Larson ; ;; :;�;; ;�;: <br /> Commissioner Matthew Montain ':` :::�`�� " <br /> � <br /> _ �::::°�: :`.� <br /> ABSENT: C m i ' ' _� �`� ' <br /> o m ssioner Thomas Wood ;� <br /> Commissioner Olaf Lee <br /> STAFF: Administrator Dallas Larson <br /> OTHERS PRESENT: Council Member D Love <br /> I. CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Mosher. <br /> l. Roll Call <br /> II. PUBLIC INPUT/I3EARING - None <br /> III. OLD BUSINESS. ' <br /> 1. Comprehensive Plan Alignment — Zoning <br /> a. R-1(Rural Residential) Change to R-2 (Low/Medium Density <br /> Residential) <br /> The Commission reviewed the proposed change. Consensus was that the three <br /> larger tracts that are ten acres or more should remain in the R-1 disfict until the <br /> owners request subdivision and development. It was noted that the property owner <br /> would be required to pay for the cost of the rezoning at the time the request is <br /> made. <br /> Motion bv Commissioner Montain. seconded bv Commissioner Flint to Aaarove the <br /> draft findings and recommendations with the modification to exclude the three <br /> parcels that exceed ten acres. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv <br /> b. R-2 (Single Family Residential) Change to R-3 (High Density Multi- <br /> Family) and R-2a to R-3 <br /> There was considerable discussion about the proposed change and whether the <br /> assumptions made in the comprehensive planning process are still valid, given the <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.