My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-01-14 Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
1998
>
1998-01-14 Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2011 10:57:53 AM
Creation date
8/22/2011 10:57:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMO <br /> DATE : January 9, 1998 <br /> TO Honorable Mayor and Council <br /> FROM : Jim March <br /> RE Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Fruth /Fischer Property <br /> The Fruths and Fischers were present at the last Planning and <br /> Zoning meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the <br /> request of the parties to have their properties included in MUSA <br /> by the means of an amendment to the comprehensive plan. The <br /> Fruths and Fischers felt that they should not be required to pay <br /> for this amendment, since they have indicated that they have been <br /> requesting to have their property in MUSA since 1993. <br /> An early 1996 draft of the new comprehensive plan showed their <br /> property being placed in the next MUSA addition. I have a copy <br /> of this draft in my office. The final version of the <br /> comprehensive plan showed their property being removed from the <br /> next MUSA phase. The Planning and Zoning Commission indicated <br /> that they would support the efforts of the property owners and <br /> recommend to the City Council that the amendment be processed at <br /> City expense. <br /> I would support the recommendation from the Planning and Zoning <br /> Commission. I explained to the property owners that even if the <br /> City Council supports the amendment proposal, the Metropolitan <br /> Council would have the responsibility to approve the amendment. <br /> I further explained that with the potential sewer system <br /> restrictions, the Met Council may approve the amendment, but they <br /> might not approve a sewer permit for a developer until the sewer <br /> capacity issues are addressed by the interceptor replacement. I <br /> would expect the expense to the City to be less than a thousand <br /> dollars in supporting this amendment. The City would be required <br /> to pay for a public hearing, apply for the amendment and then <br /> update the MUSA maps in the comprehensive plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.