Laserfiche WebLink
DAN AND DENISE SAXTON <br /> 1949 73RD STREET <br /> CENTERVILLE, MN 55038 <br /> July 1, 1998 <br /> Dear Counsel Members: <br /> We are appealing to you in regards to Ordinance 4. Recently our next door neighbor <br /> erected a shed that is 14 feet wide, 24 feet long and 17 feet high. This shed is 10 feet from <br /> our lot line and 25 feet from the back lot line. The lot sizes for our neighbor and ourselves <br /> are approx. 1 /2 acre. Upon speaking with the inspector, these specifications are within the <br /> city's requirements. <br /> The following ordinance we received from city hall: <br /> Section 34.06 -1 AMOUNT OF YARD OCCUPIED. In the R -2A, R -2 and R -5 <br /> zoning districts a detached accessory building not over one story and not exceeding <br /> fourteen (14 feet in height may occupy not to exceed ten (10) percent square footage of <br /> the area of any rear yard. The height of the accessory building shall not exceed the height <br /> of the prima —Yt building. <br /> The ordinance is contradictory. <br /> " not exceeding 14 feet in fickhP and <br /> t °The height of the accessor�l building, shall not exceed the height of the primM <br /> In regards to structure next door: <br /> 1. It has 2 stories <br /> 2. 17 feet in height <br /> How can the city of Centerville allow this monstrosity to be erected? This structure is <br /> too large for the lot it was built upon, too high and too close to the lot line. This is not just <br /> a standard yard barn like most people along our street have. It equals the size of a single car <br /> garage, put along the side lot line, length wise, centering both the back yards. <br /> Major efforts were put forth to landscape /beautify our own property, and we are <br /> extremely concerned that this structure will have an impact on the value of our home. <br /> The permit still open from his basement, (from some time ago) was just added on to <br /> for building the shed. The inspector also felt that they should have had to acquire a <br /> separate permit. Why was he allowed to do this? <br />