Laserfiche WebLink
Sept. 3rd, 1998 <br /> City of Centerville <br /> 1880 Main 5l. <br /> Centerville, Mn. <br /> Att RyChel <br /> Re: Buechler Estates Development <br /> Dear Ry -Chet. <br /> As a f0ow -up to our meeting with Parks and Rec last evening, and your subsequent <br /> conversation with Jay McNabb, please accept this letter as our understanding of our agreement <br /> with the City of Centerville, thus far, It was my understanding that the Park and Rec fees would <br /> be $950.00 per lot for 5 lots, for a total = $4,750.00. That was also the understanding of Mr. <br /> Lessard, who appeared before us in front of Parks and Recreation lest evening, and it was also <br /> the agreement reached with the Rehbeln Company on their latest development. Thus, I cannot <br /> see how the City of Centerville could treat us any differently. If they intend to, I need to know <br /> Immediately, a$ it will cause me to either halt the project completely or to seek some type of <br /> ruling establishing that amount as the agreed -upon fees. I cannot afford to proceed further until <br /> that clarification is made. Neither I nor any other developer can afford to develop that property if <br /> they are required to pay 10% of the purchase price in Park and Rec. fees. My development <br /> costs are going to be extremely high as is, and I have based all of my projections on the sum of <br /> $950.00 per lot in these fees. If it runs higher than that, I simply can't afford to develop the <br /> property. <br /> It Is my further understanding that you will require the sum of $5,000.00 to be escrowed <br /> prior to next week's ecuncii meeting. I will agree to do so, so long as I have an agreement in <br /> place with the City prior to then regarding the Park and Rec fees. Without that agreement, I <br /> can't justify spending any further money on this project, and I will have to explore whatever <br /> options may be available to me. Therefore, I need to know as quickly as possible what the <br /> City's position is with respect to these fees. <br /> One other item that I would like to clarify are the statements made by the City Engineer <br /> to my surveyors concerning soil borings and/or soil corrections on the road. It is my <br /> understanding that I may be asked to supply two soil boring tests on the road and make any <br /> soil corrections required. I do not feel responsible for the testing and/or repair of an existing <br /> road. That road has benefited and will continue to benefit many owners other than myself, and I <br /> certainly have not been the person responsible for any lack of maintenance, If the City can <br />