Laserfiche WebLink
NELSON FENCE VARIANCE <br /> PUBLIC HEARING -- Nelson Fence Variance Request - July 9,1996 <br /> Mari and Roger Nelson, 1846 - 73rd Street, explained that the variance is for a 6 foot <br /> fence around their backyard. Because their lot is on a comer it is considered a side lot <br /> they would only be allowed to put up a 4 foot fence. <br /> The application for the variance request completed by the Nelsons explains the reasons for <br /> a 6 foot privacy fence. <br /> No residents present regarding this issue. <br /> MOTION by Drilling, second by Welk to adjourn the public hearing for the Nelson Fence <br /> variance request. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Nelson Fence Variance Recommendation - July 9, 1996 <br /> Welk stated the view for traffic on the street doesn't seem to be hindered by a fence. <br /> Mr. Nyberg suggested landscaping instead of a fence. <br /> TourvHle stated a solid wood fence is for privacy and from the street side it looks like a <br /> stockyard. <br /> Drilling doesn't see a reason to grant a variance. LaMotte agreed with Drilling. <br /> Tourville questioned the need for a 6 foot, whether a 4 foot fence wouldn't be sufficient. <br /> He also added that comer lots do present a problem. <br /> MOTION by LaMotte, second by Drilling to table for further research. Staff is requested <br /> to survey surrounding communities to see how they address fences on corner lots. Motion <br /> carried unanimously. <br /> Nelson Fence Variance -August 6, 1996 <br /> P &Z decided that the main concern would be for visibility and that it doesn't appear to <br /> hinder visibility for traffic on 73rd. <br /> MOTION by Welk, second by Drilling to grant a variance allowing a 6 foot fence - as <br /> proposed - for a comer lot at 1846 - 73rd Street, as long as the set backs are met, it <br /> doesn't obstruct vision for traffic in the area and that the neighbors are also in favor of <br /> granting the variance. Motion carried unanimously. <br />