My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1996-06-10 - CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
1996
>
1996-06-10 - CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2011 11:47:24 AM
Creation date
8/30/2011 11:47:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council minutes of May 29, 1996 Workshop <br /> A resolution to set a charge to the residents that would be used to correct swales down <br /> the road. <br /> Dave explained to Rockey what was discussed previously regarding as builts. <br /> Rockey stated he doesn't expect to receive a certificate of occupancy (C.O.) until <br /> September. He questioned that if the city requires 150% letter of credit, why isn't that <br /> good enough. The city is doing two things - requiring a letter of credit and holding back <br /> building permits. Dave said it is so much easier to have it graded from the start. <br /> Dave informed Rockey that Outlot C would be a part of the approved grading plan, <br /> therefore he would be responsible for the grading per the developers agreement. <br /> Rockey stated that he has sold (has money down) approximately 12 lots already, some of <br /> which are current Centerville residents. <br /> Rockey said that is C.O. could be withheld if the property is not within 1 /10 of a foot from <br /> the grading plan. <br /> They discussed putting a deadline in the development agreement for the grading of 5 -6 <br /> months. Escrowing money from the time t and freezing until thaw and work is <br /> complete. Suggested escro a gra e Xime limit to have grading completed by <br /> November I st. <br /> There will be a sidewalk ee of Brian Drive. <br /> Dave asked about a temporary turn around on the Lake Area Utilities property. Rockey <br /> said they won't allow it. Rockey stated they could put a temporary easments providing <br /> turn around space on lots 5 and 28. The city may want to escrow to remove the <br /> bituminous for the future development to the south, Dave suggested. <br /> They discussed the dead end of Brian Drive, whether a turn around is necessary or not. <br /> Other developments just have it as a dead end with signs. Consensus that it just be a dead <br /> end with signage. <br /> Dave stated that easements have to be written separately. A separate document stating <br /> that there are trail easements on lots 12 and 13 and lots 23 and 24. <br /> Dave suggested a landscape easement for lots 5 -10 and lot 27 & 28 so that the property <br /> owner could not remove the berm. Also note in the developer agreement that lots 27 & <br /> 28 should have driveways fronting on Brian Court. <br /> Rockey stated that the construction traffic generated by him would be minimumal down <br /> Brian Drive because it is already close to the specified grade. Dave added that is true but <br /> that the utility contractor is not allowed to use Brian Drive. <br /> CC5- 29WK.WPS Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.