1996-06-10 - CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council minutes of May 29, 1996 Workshop A resolution to set a charge to the residents that would be used to correct swales down the road. Dave explained to Rockey what was discussed previously regarding as builts. Rockey stated he doesn't expect to receive a certificate of occupancy (C.O.) until September. He questioned that if the city requires 150% letter of credit, why isn't that good enough. The city is doing two things - requiring a letter of credit and holding back building permits. Dave said it is so much easier to have it graded from the start. Dave informed Rockey that Outlot C would be a part of the approved grading plan, therefore he would be responsible for the grading per the developers agreement. Rockey stated that he has sold (has money down) approximately 12 lots already, some of which are current Centerville residents. Rockey said that is C.O. could be withheld if the property is not within 1 /10 of a foot from the grading plan. They discussed putting a deadline in the development agreement for the grading of 5 -6 months. Escrowing money from the time t and freezing until thaw and work is complete. Suggested escro a gra e Xime limit to have grading completed by November I st. There will be a sidewalk ee of Brian Drive. Dave asked about a temporary turn around on the Lake Area Utilities property. Rockey said they won't allow it. Rockey stated they could put a temporary easments providing turn around space on lots 5 and 28. The city may want to escrow to remove the bituminous for the future development to the south, Dave suggested. They discussed the dead end of Brian Drive, whether a turn around is necessary or not. Other developments just have it as a dead end with signs. Consensus that it just be a dead end with signage. Dave stated that easements have to be written separately. A separate document stating that there are trail easements on lots 12 and 13 and lots 23 and 24. Dave suggested a landscape easement for lots 5 -10 and lot 27 & 28 so that the property owner could not remove the berm. Also note in the developer agreement that lots 27 & 28 should have driveways fronting on Brian Court. Rockey stated that the construction traffic generated by him would be minimumal down Brian Drive because it is already close to the specified grade. Dave added that is true but that the utility contractor is not allowed to use Brian Drive. CC5- 29WK.WPS Page 3