Laserfiche WebLink
Parks & Recreation Committee <br /> Meeting Minutes <br />08-03-11 <br /> <br />Mr. Faust informed the committee he has his volunteers and the equipment ready to start the flag pole <br />th <br />project on Saturday, August 6, but there is now a large pile of dirt from moving the driveways right in <br />the spot where the flagpole was to go. Mr. Faust tried to contact Mr. Palzer who is out of town on <br />vacation for the next two weeks. He is also concerned about the timing of the contractors test concrete <br />pour which was going to be utilized for the flag pole. <br /> <br />Chairperson Branch explained to the committee that the contractor for the trail project has to do a test <br />concrete pour which is then tore out and discarded when the test is completed. Mr. Palzer proposed using <br />the concrete for the flagpole instead, making the area slightly larger at about 10-12’ diameter surrounding <br />a 3’ hole in the middle for the flag pole. <br /> <br />The committee directed Mr. Faust to contact Mr. Greg Burmeister, Project Manager, for information <br />about the dirt pile, the test concrete pour and when it would be advisable to schedule the installation of <br />the flagpole. The committee felt Mr. Faust’s project may have to be delayed until September. <br /> <br />Chairperson Branch is not convinced that the solar lights will be satisfactory and has proposed another <br />solution of placing lights on the existing street lamp poles.Mr. Palzer supplied the committee with a cost <br /> <br />estimate from Rivard Electric for $1,449. The committee was surprised at the cost. Committee Member <br />Peterson questioned whether the estimate was so high because it was on one of the poles City Council <br />has elected to turn off to conserve costs and would like to see a breakdown of the electrical costs included <br />in the estimate. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Committee Member Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Amundsen to <br />request staff research why this estimate is so high and what can be done to lower the costs. The <br />committee would also request soliciting two more bids.All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />IV. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES <br /> <br />July 6, 2011 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Committee Member Peterson requested changing the following sentence on page 3 of 5 under Movies in <br />the Park to reflect ‘Committee Member Peterson’ instead of ‘Chairperson Peterson’. Chairperson <br />Peterson suggested letting Creative Kids pick out the movie(s). <br /> <br />Committee Member Seeley requested the word ‘in’ be changed to ‘is’ in the last sentence on page 2. <br />Committee Member Seeley also requested replacing the question mark with a period in the following <br />sentence on page 5 of 5 - There was concern this might be a violation of the City’s Waste Management <br />contract? <br /> <br />Committee Member Peterson requested changing the word ‘lens’ to ‘lumens’ on page 3 under Movies in <br />the Park. <br /> <br />Motion was made by Committee Member Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Seeley, to <br />approve the July 6, 2011 Parks & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes with the above <br />corrections. Ayes – 5, Nays – 0, Abstain – 1 (Haiden). Motion carried. <br /> <br />2 of 6 <br /> <br />