My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-12-23 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2003
>
2003-12-23 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:55:10 PM
Creation date
2/9/2006 11:04:56 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />"or- <br /> <br />Ie <br /> <br /> <br />STAFF REPORT <br />CENTERVILLE CITY COUNClL <br /> <br />Date: December 23, 2003 <br /> <br />To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br />Ms. Kim Moore-Sykes, City AclmiDi~tor <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />Ellen PauJseth, Finance Director <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Re: Hunters Crossing Phase I <br /> <br />*...*****.*.*****..****.*.**..*.**.....***.***.*......*..******.******** <br /> <br />Mr. Richard Carlson has requested return of the $7,000 escrow that was paid under <br />condition of the Hunters Crossing Phase I Development Contract executed in the year <br />2000. <br /> <br />Bond proceeds for the project were received in November of the year 2000. The final <br />payment to the contractor, Northdale Construction, for the public improvements was <br />approved and paid in November of2oo2. The final payment to the city engineering firm <br />for engineering connected with the project was paid in May of2oo3. Copies of both <br />invoices are attached. <br /> <br />City staff is requesting that Council adopt contract language that would more clearly <br />define.the point at which escrow funds can be returned. For developments in which the <br />developer has utilized the MS. Chapter 429 process, it would seem that escrow could be <br />returned at the time bond proceeds are received, unless Council desires otherwise. For <br />developments in which the developer is financing his own improvements, final inspection <br />may be the appropriate time. We do not think that it is the intent of Council to maintain <br />escrow until the warranty period expires, but the development contracts have not been <br />specific as to when the escrow funds should be returned. <br /> <br />In addition, there are funds in the amount of$35,908.51, consisting of excess bond <br />proceeds and interest income, remaining in the capital project account. This amount <br />should. be transferred to the debt service fund to assist in paying off the bonds. It should <br />not be used for warranty issues. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.