My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-12-01 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2003
>
2003-12-01 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:55:31 PM
Creation date
2/9/2006 11:37:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
72
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City ofCenterville <br />November 12, 2003 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the City does pay for over sizing. She <br />then said that the $50,000 was to assist with looping and pay for those costs not: <br />specifically to reduce the assessment to the benefiting property owners. <br /> <br />Ms. Lofgren asked whether her written objection should be submitted at this time. She <br />then left her objection with Council. <br /> <br />Mr. Simonson indicated that applying the $50,000 to the $99,000 and dividing the rest by <br />the $24,000 the price is amazingly close to what would have paid if the City waited until <br />they did the road. <br /> <br />Mr. Schweppe asked proportionately how the funds benefit Lakeland Hills better by <br />running water to The Shores. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson indicated that extension of the watermain was for future ability to loop back <br />down to Peltier Lake Drive so there are really tWo points' of looping Peltier Lake Drive, <br />Centerville Road and Main Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Tim Stevenson, 7289 Mill Road, asked how many years the assessments are to be <br />paid over. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated the payment is over a 10-year period. <br /> <br />Mr. Stevenson indicated that his City water is working great and he does not see the <br />benefit of having to pay for this when he already had water. He further commented that <br />the developer should pay for the water 1000.10 if he needs it for his development as he <br />makes a lot of money. <br /> <br />Mr. Stevenson indicated he received money back from the City as he had overpaid an <br />assessment two years ago. He also indicated that he has City water. He further <br />commented that he has City water and does not benefit from the water being run past his <br />property. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated she would look into the matter and contact Mr. Stevenson to <br />discuss it. <br /> <br />Mr Peterson indicated there is no water main in front of Mr. Stevenson's house but the <br />line was run kitty comer to provide water service to his property. <br /> <br />Motion by Counell Member Lee.. seconded by Councll Member Pur to continue <br />the DubHe hearin2. AD in favor. Motion carried unanimo~ly. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would like to look into how much <br />money is available from the $50,000 set aside and use those funds to offset the over <br />sizing and the rest to offsetting the costs to the residents. <br /> <br />Page 5 of 15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.