2003-07-23 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Planning &; Zoning Board June 11, 2003 Page 2 few years ago they questioned if they would be a safety hazard due to the possibility of them being crushed by snow. Most of the structures, however, are to cover things such as boats. Staff did not believe there would be safety issues from that standpoint. Chair Schaps suggested there be an exception to the permit requirement for a situation such as a party, as the structure would only be needed for a day or two. He directed staff to bring the suggestions of the Commission to the Council for discussion. Mr. Tralle commented not all of these structures are cheap. There are some structures that can house four rv's at a cost of$6,OOO. Chair Schaps inquired if a structure of that size would fall under the accessory structure ordinance. Mr. Smyser responded it is very common in situations like this for the manufacturer to say a permit is not required. That, however, is up to the individual municipality. Mr. TraIle asked how a large structure like this would fit into a mra1 zone. Mr. Smyser responded currently the amount of allowed accessory building space is dependent on the size of the lot, and the temporary structures could be included in this. Mr. TralIe questioned if passing an ordinance in relation to these structures would create another ordinance that is not going to be enforced. Mr. Lyden asked how many inquiries or complaints staffreceives regarding these structures in a one year period. Mr. Smyser responded in the last 12 months staffhas been contacted regarding this approximately 12 times, with two or three of these being complaints. They are not peppered with complaints, but by the time we are, there would already be a problem He indicated staff will discuss the suggestions of the Commission and bring back the possibilities to be considered. They may not even want to deal with it, but he thinks it is important to have the discussion. . ~ DRAFf MINUTES