Laserfiche WebLink
This opinion will be unpublished and <br /> may not be cited except as provided by <br /> Minn. Stat. § 480A.08, subd. 3 (2010). <br /> STATE OF MINNESOTA <br /> IN COURT OF APPEALS <br /> A11 -0827 <br /> A11 -1375 <br /> Sheehy Construction Company, <br /> Respondent, <br /> vs. <br /> City of Centerville, <br /> Appellant. <br /> Filed May 14, 2012 <br /> Affirmed as modified <br /> Hudson, Judge <br /> Anoka County District Court <br /> File No. 02 -CV -09 -5300 <br /> Dean B. Thomson, Kristine Kroenke, Fabyanske, Westra, Hart & Thomson, P.A., <br /> Minneapolis, Minnesota (for respondent) <br /> Kurt Glaser, Smith & Glaser, LLC, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for appellant) <br /> Considered and decided by Ross, Presiding Judge; Halbrooks, Judge; and Hudson, <br /> Judge. <br /> UNPUBLISHED OPINION <br /> HUDSON, Judge <br /> Appellant city challenges the district court's judgments setting aside and <br /> remanding a special assessment adopted with respect to real property owned by <br /> respondent construction company and granting respondent its associated costs and <br /> 14 <br />