My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2011 Audit Management Letter
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Audits
>
2011
>
2011 Audit Management Letter
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/9/2012 10:32:27 AM
Creation date
12/26/2012 7:25:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />March 28, 2012 <br />Page 4 <br />Financial Position and Results of Operations <br />Our principal observations and recommendations are summarized on the following pages. These recommendations resulted from our <br />observations made in connection with our audit of the City’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011. <br />General Fund <br />The General fund is used to account for resources traditionally associated with government, which are not required legally or by <br />sound principal management to be accounted for in another fund. The General fund balance increased $73,910 from 2010. The <br />fund balance of $1,142,321 is 55 percent of the 2012 budgeted expenditures. The total General fund budget is $2,054,700 for <br />2011. We recommend the fund balance be maintained at a level sufficient to fund operations until the major revenue sources are <br />received in June. We feel a reserve of approximately 40 to 50 percent of planned expenditures and transfers out is adequate to <br />meet working capital and small emergency needs. At the current level, the fund balance is above the minimum but Council has <br />acknowledged the amount. Council adopted a fund balance resolution and the City is in compliance with this resolution. <br />The Office of the State Auditor (the OSA) has issued a Statement of Position relating to fund balance stating “a local government <br />should identify fund balance separately between reserved and unreserved fund balance. The local government may assign and <br />report some or all of the fund balance as designated and undesignated.” We recommend local governments adopt a formal policy <br />on the level of unreserved fund balance that should be maintained in the General and special revenue funds. This helps address <br />citizen concerns as to the use of fund balance and tax levels. <br />The purposes and benefits of an adequate fund balance are as follows: <br />Expenditures are incurred somewhat evenly throughout the year. However, property tax and state aid revenues are not <br />received until the second half of the year. An adequate fund balance will provide the cash flow required to finance the <br />governmental fund expenditures. <br />The City is vulnerable to legislative actions at the State and Federal level. The State continually adjusts the local government <br />aid and property tax credit formulas. We also have seen the State mandate levy limits for cities over 2,500 in population. An <br />adequate fund balance will provide a temporary buffer against those aid adjustments and levy limits. <br />Expenditures not anticipated at the time the annual budget was adopted may need immediate Council action. These would <br />include capital outlay replacement, lawsuits and other items. An adequate fund balance will provide the financing needed for <br />such expenditures. <br />A strong fund balance will assist the City in obtaining, maintaining or improving its bond rating. The result will be better <br />interest rates in future bond sales. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.