My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-23 Handout @ Work Session (CSAH21)
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2013
>
2013-01-23 Handout @ Work Session (CSAH21)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2013 2:58:54 PM
Creation date
1/24/2013 10:35:43 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
StanteC <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> b. Alternatively, you could undertake the full <br /> reconstruction with streetscaping at this time. However, that would involve property <br /> acquisition and building demolition (on the block between Main and Sorel). <br /> We recommend Option 2 —No Improvements. The roadway is Inadequate condition and is not in need of <br /> immediate repair, Choosing this option leaves us the most flexibility in the future. There would be no cost to <br /> the city for this section, if Option 2 is chosen. <br /> Heritage Street to Meadow Lane <br /> The county's current plan shows this area proposed as: <br /> • Two -lane urban section roadway <br /> • Right turn lanes <br /> • Ditch on the west side (even though there is curb and gutter) <br /> • Full reconstruction <br /> • Existing concrete walk on the east side would remain in place (or be replaced in -kind) <br /> We encourage the city to support the current design in this segment. The city may be responsible for the <br /> cost of curb and gutter and its share of storm sewer in this area. <br /> Meadow Lane to Center Street <br /> The county's current plan shows this area proposed as: <br /> • Two -lane rural section roadway <br /> • Right turn lanes <br /> • 4' paved shoulders where there are no turn lanes <br /> • Full reconstruction <br /> • No trails or sidewalks <br /> A previous version of the county's draft plan showed this area as urban section. We would still like to have <br /> the county explore this option for a number of reasons. <br /> • Minimizes impacts to adjacent properties <br /> • Allows the addition of trails /sidewalks in the future without property acquisition or re- grading. <br /> • Provides an urban, in -city environment which promotes traffic calming <br /> • Is more aesthetically pleasing (allows mowing) <br /> Our examination of making this area an urban section, without ditches, shows that the road must be lowered <br /> by about five (5) feet throughout this segment in order to eliminate the need for ditches. The county's plan <br /> already shows this area being lowered by 1— 2 feet. Lowering the road by 5 feet causes driveways on the <br /> west side to become fairly steep and necessitates cutting the intersection at Center Street back about 80 feet <br /> or so. It appears that this area could be made into an urban section, without ditches. However, further, <br /> more detailed design is necessary to make sure this is the best alternative. <br /> We recommend asking the county to consider making this segment an urban section, Making this segment <br /> an urban section could add costs to the city for curb and gutter and storm sewer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.