My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-01-23 Stantec Ltr. Re. CSAH21 Improvements Provided @ Worksession
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2013
>
2013-01-23 Stantec Ltr. Re. CSAH21 Improvements Provided @ Worksession
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2013 10:39:49 AM
Creation date
1/24/2013 10:38:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stantec <br />Janaury 23, 2013 <br />Stantec Consulting Services Inc. <br />2335 Highway 36 West <br />St. Paul MN 55113 <br />Tel: (651) 636 -4600 <br />Fax: (651) 636 -1311 <br />Dallas Larson <br />Administrator <br />City of Centerville <br />1880 Main Street <br />Centerville, MN 55038 -9794 <br />Re: CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) Reconstruction <br />City of Centerville <br />Temp. File No.: 193801639 <br />Dear Dallas: <br />At the request of the City Council, we have reviewed the county's preliminary design for the reconstruction of <br />CSAH 21 (Centerville Road) from Main Street to the southern city limits. The following are our comments: <br />Main Street to Heritage Street <br />The county's current plan shows this area proposed as: <br />Two -lane urban section roadway <br />Right turn lanes /Parking lanes <br />Mill and overlay <br />Existing concrete curb and gutter would remain in place <br />This segment is part of the City's Downtown Redevelopment Area. With this in mind, the City has a few <br />options for this portion of the roadway: <br />1. Allow the overlay <br />a. This would make it difficult to gain <br />participation from the County if the road were to be reconstructed as part of a downtown <br />redevelopment in the next 15 years. <br />2. Ask County to leave this section out of the proposed improvements <br />a. This allows us to ask for participation from <br />the County-if we decide to reconstruct this segment in the next 15 years. <br />b. The one drawback here is that there may be <br />some questions from the public as to why the whole road was reconstructed and just these <br />two blocks were left untouched. Hopefully, a little communication can explain our reasoning. <br />3. Go forward with the full reconstruction at this time. <br />a. One version of this option would be to just <br />reconstruct the street between the curbs. Then, at a later date (with redevelopment), we <br />would remove the curb and add on parking lanes, new curb and streetscaping. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.