My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013-04-10 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2013
>
2013-04-10 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/5/2013 2:50:01 PM
Creation date
4/5/2013 2:49:58 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br /> Council Meeting Minutes <br /> March 27, 2013 <br /> the more substantial raingarden requirements. Engineer Statz stated that they are willing to work <br /> with residents that will be receiving a raingarden on their property regarding (ability to access <br /> rear yard, recommended plantings if desired and paid for by the homeowner, etc.). <br /> Engineer Statz stated that the elevation of the new roadway would better than the existing <br /> roadway, additional catch basins would be installed and that the City would work with him <br /> regarding the curbing and his existing driveway in attempt to fulfill the City's need and his <br /> needs. <br /> Engineer Statz stated that it is most economical that a watermain be installed at the same time as <br /> the Type I improvements. This improvement would be outside of this assessment hearing <br /> process, if a property owner chooses to connect to those services in conjunction with this project <br /> it would allow them the ability to take advantage of the assessment process for those services and <br /> utilize the City's contractor potentially providing a cost savings to them. Engineer Statz stated <br /> that an Assessment Right to Appeal Waiver would need to be granted by the property owner <br /> requesting connection and all associated assessments. Engineer Statz also stated that this <br /> assessment would bring the water service from the right of way into the home. One (1) hose bib <br /> or outside facet would be allowed unless the homeowner desired for the well to be abandoned at <br /> an additional cost. Engineer Statz stated that the contractor is willing to bore the water line <br /> which will provide minimal disturbance to yards versus connection at a later date. <br /> Discussion was had regarding policies currently in place for connection versus future Council's <br /> desires for possible extension of the connection deadline date. <br /> Finance Director Jeziorski reviewed the assessment, interest rate (4 %), length of the assessment <br /> for the Type I (15 years) and Type 11 (10 years) and bonding amount. <br /> Legal Counsel Glaser stated that resident input would be kept at five (5) minutes, requested that <br /> those that desired to speak come forward to the podium and sign in. Legal Counsel Glaser also <br /> reviewed for residents the procedure for filling objections to the assessments at the meeting and <br /> following the meeting. <br /> Mayor Wilharber opened the floor for resident input/comments. The following persons with <br /> regard to the special assessment project: <br /> Ms. Mary Capra, 1810 Fox Run Finance Director Jeziorski read a public comment received <br /> from her stating her support for the project and commending Council for their diligence with <br /> continuing the street improvements from 2004. <br /> Mr. Joe Steele, 6926 Center Street questioned the curbing choice and how it would affect his <br /> newly constructed driveway. Mr. Steele also had concern regarding the amount of water in the <br /> roadway and property owners' yards. <br /> Mr. Joe Steele, 6926 Sumac Court requested a total dollar amount for both the street <br /> reconstruction and water connection if assessed to his property. Mr. Steele stated that it <br /> appeared that the low bidder had placed equipment approximately one (1) week ago and felt that <br /> due to the timing of the public hearing this was extremely inappropriate. Mr. Steele stated that <br /> Page 2 of 9 <br /> P2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.