Laserfiche WebLink
Summary: Centerville, Minnesota; General Obligation <br /> We consider the Centerville's financial management practices "good" under Standard & Poor's Financial Management <br /> Assessment methodology, indicating that financial management practices exist in most areas, although all may not be <br /> formalized or regularly monitored. Highlights of these practices include regular reporting of budget and investment <br /> performance to elected officials, a formal five -year capital improvement plan updated annually, and a formal policy to <br /> maintain a general fund balance at 40 % -50% of expenditures. Weaknesses include the lack of formalized long -term <br /> financial planning and a debt policy beyond state guidelines. <br /> We consider the city's overall net debt burden moderately high at 6.2% of market value but more moderate on a <br /> per- capita basis at $4,635. In addition, debt service as a percentage of governmental expenditures less capital outlay <br /> was a high 30.4% of total government expenditures less capital outlay. Although much of this debt is self - supported, it <br /> is with the use of special assessments; we do not give self - support credit for debt serviced by this revenue stream since <br /> it is similar in nature to property taxes. Amortization is above average, with 79% of debt to be retired over 10 years. <br /> The city has no future debt plans identified at this time. <br /> All qualified city employees participate in a pension plan administered by the Public Employees Retirement <br /> Association of Minnesota, a cost - sharing, multiple- employer retirement plan. The city made all employer pension <br /> contributions as required by state statute in fiscal 2012, which totaled $38,899, or 1.3% of governmental expenditures. <br /> Retirees can participate in city health insurance but cover their own costs. <br /> Outlook <br /> The stable outlook reflects our expectation that management will continue to make necessary adjustments to offset <br /> potential further decreases in taxable valuation or other revenue pressures. We do not expect the rating to change <br /> within the two -year parameter of the stable outlook because we believe the city will maintain consistently strong <br /> reserves. <br /> Related Criteria And Research <br /> USPF Criteria: GO Debt, Oct. 12, 2006 <br /> Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings <br /> affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use <br /> the Ratings search box located in the left column. <br /> WWW. STANDARDANDPOORS .COM /RATINGSDIRECT MAY 14, 2013 3 <br /> 1131794 1300238792 <br />