Laserfiche WebLink
(3 Stantec <br /> September 25, 2013 <br /> Dallas Larson <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> Reference: Royal Meadows Water Main - Draft Feasibility Report <br /> With those options eliminated, it leaves us with four (4) viable options, each with its own pros and cons. <br /> Those options again are: <br /> Option Description Cost Estimate <br /> 1A — OC Open Cut" in street. Reclaim /Pave entire street. $619,000 <br /> Pro: WM in traditional location Con: Most expensive option <br /> Pro: Full new pavement section Con: Construction access difficult <br /> Pro: New curb one side of street <br /> i — DD Dir. Drill "in street. Patch at service taps & fittings. 1.5" Overlay. $533, <br /> Pro: WM in traditional location Con: Patchwork street /reflective cracking <br /> Pro: Lower cost Con: Longer service lines <br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> 2 — OC Open Cut" in boulevard. Patch driveways. 1.5" Overlay. $540,000 <br /> Pro: Lower cost Con: WM +/- 15' from homes <br /> Pro: New driveways on one side Con: Mature trees lost <br /> Con: Utility conflicts (gas, elec., etc.) <br /> 2—DD Dir. Drill "in boulevard. No driveway impacts. 1.5" Overlay. $523,000 <br /> Pro: Lowest cost Con: WM +/- 15' from homes <br /> Pro: No trees lost Con: No new driveways <br /> Pro: No joints in pipe <br /> We will be on hand at the City Council meeting tonight to discuss these options in more detail. Once the <br /> council decides on a preferred option, we will finalize the feasibility report. <br /> STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC. <br /> 10 � �"k . ';:� <br /> Mark R. Statz, PE <br /> Senior Project Manager <br /> Phone: (651) 60 4 - 47 0 9 <br /> Fax: (651) 636 -1311 <br /> Mark.Statz@stantec.com <br /> Attachment: <br /> C. <br /> Design with community In mind <br /> sm v.\ 1938 \active \193802483\ design \draft fears, report memo.docx <br />