My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-03-26 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2014
>
2014-03-26 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2014 1:38:25 PM
Creation date
3/21/2014 1:38:23 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br /> Council Meeting Minutes <br /> March 12, 2014 <br /> Engineer Statz stated that traffic would be limited to only local traffic and that the County would <br /> phase the reconstruction between Birch Street and Dupre Road and the Dupre Road to Sorel. <br /> Mr. Charles Reinhardt, 1723 Meadow Lane, stated that he too had concerns regarding the <br /> additional traffic and the speed of those attempting to by -pass construction. <br /> Mr. Bill Kujala, 7341 Deer Paas Drive, stated that not one person within his cul de sac desired <br /> the work to be completed due to the fact there was nothing wrong with the current roadway, it <br /> was a cul de sac, did not have through traffic and presented Council with a signed petition of 12 <br /> property owners of 14 parcels abutting Deer Pass Drive. <br /> Mr. Mike Garceau, 1871 — 73 Street, stated that he felt that the street in front of his home was <br /> in good shape, did not need any maintenance and did not understand how maintaining the <br /> roadway would increase the value of his home. <br /> Mr. Dave Luke, 7026 Brian Court, also stated that he resided on a cul de sac that has limited <br /> traffic, maintenance at this time was not needed and felt that within 3 -4 years a new road would <br /> need to be constructed anyway due to the poor soils. <br /> Ms. Jodi West, 1825 Revoir Street, stated that the roadway in front of her home does not show <br /> signs of deterioration, confusion over the City's roadway maintenance budget, concern for full <br /> reconstruction in the future and the Council's long range budget planning for future projects. <br /> After everyone who wished to do so had been given an opportunity to sneak, a motion was <br /> made by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member King to close the <br /> public hearing at 7:05 p.m. All in favor. Motion carried. <br /> The Mayor opened the public hearing on the Proposed Assessments at 7:06 p.m. <br /> 2. Proposed Assessments — 2014 Mill & Overlay Project <br /> Engineer Statz stated that this was the second of two hearings held this evening with this hearing <br /> focusing on the proposed amount of assessments and whether the value of the improvement falls <br /> within the guidelines of the 429 process. <br /> Legal Counsel Glaser stated that the cost of the improvement may be assessed upon property <br /> benefited by the improvement, based upon the benefits received and he believes that the City is <br /> well within the perimeters. <br /> Mayor Wilharber stated that the Council is proposing $500 per benefiting properties. <br /> Mr. Kujala questioned whether he would also be paying more in property taxes due to the added <br /> improvement and questioned the process for the assessments. Administrator Larson stated that <br /> valuations are unlikely to increase because of this work but rather would not increase until the <br /> sales prices in his neighborhood justify an increase. <br /> Page 3of8 <br /> 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.