My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-04-09 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2014
>
2014-04-09 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2014 11:25:01 AM
Creation date
4/4/2014 11:18:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br />Honorable Mayor andCityCouncil <br />City of Centerville, Minnesota <br />We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial statements of <br />thegovernmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of theCity of <br />Centerville, Minnesota (the City), as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2013,and the related notes to the financial statements, <br />and have issued our report thereon dated March 29, 2014. <br />Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions <br />The , promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota <br />Statute§6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of <br />interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing.Our study included all <br />of the listed categories except that we did not test for compliance in tax increment financing because the City has not established a tax <br />increment financing district. <br />In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with theprovisions <br />Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions <br />of the . However, our audit was not directed primarily toward <br />obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to <br />our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. <br />This report is intended solely for the information and use those charged with governance and management of the City and the State <br />Auditor and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. <br />ABDO, EICK& MEYERS, LLP <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />March 29, 2014 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.