My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-04-23 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2014
>
2014-04-23 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2014 7:22:15 AM
Creation date
4/17/2014 4:17:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Joint powers entities and their employees enjoy the benefits of <br /> "governmental immunity" from liability for its operations. In court, it is <br /> easier to prove governmental immunity of an employee than it is for <br /> independent contractors; and, <br /> 3. The Department of Labor and judicial precedent truly has the last word <br /> about who is, or is not, an independent contractor. So placing this term <br /> in a joint powers agreement has little legal effect unless an individual <br /> truly fits within the State's legal definition of an independent <br /> contractor. <br /> d. Use of the term "the parties" or "party" Section 10 <br /> i. I question the intent of using the term "the parties." The term "governmental <br /> units" is used most other parts of the agreement. Use of the term "the parties" <br /> must be defined, or else revised to use the term "governmental units." As <br /> discussed above, the intent of using this term may be different in paragraphs <br /> 10.4 from paragraphs 10.3, 10.5 to 10.6 because sometimes it appears to apply <br /> to the employees of a governmental unit, and in other paragraphs it appears to <br /> apply to the governmental units themselves. <br /> KBG <br /> 4 <br /> 81 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.