My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-02-11 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2015
>
2015-02-11 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 4:00:06 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 3:58:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - WHITE BEAR LAKE <br /> LAWSUIT <br /> Position: <br /> Washington County adopted the Washington County Groundwater Plan 2014-2024 in September of <br /> 2014. This plan specifically calls to monitor the outcome of the Minnesota Department of Natural <br /> Resources (DNR) lawsuit and evaluate how the final disposition will impact groundwater management <br /> decisions in the county. Washington County does not support the White Bear Lake Settlement <br /> Agreement as it currently stands for the following reasons: <br /> F The DNR does not agree that science supports the plaintiffs' theory that groundwater pumping <br /> is the primary cause of low water levels in White Bear Lake; however in the settlement <br /> agreement the DNR has agreed to support action, at great expense, to convert groundwater- <br /> supplied communities to a surface water supply. <br /> C A second study by the united States Geological Survey to analyze which groundwater wells, if <br /> any, may have the greatest impact on White Bear Lake will not be available until fall of 2016. <br /> C The impact on surface water sustainability is not addressed and should be studied before such <br /> drastic and costly actions are mandated. <br /> C The financial implications of the settlement agreement need to be addressed as actions <br /> mandated in the settlement will affect economic development. The affected communities have <br /> been planning for growth as directed by the Metropolitan Council, investing millions of dollars in <br /> groundwater-based water supply infrastructure. <br /> The settlement agreement instructs the DNR to work with the 13 communities to implement <br /> conservation efforts. Groundwater is a regional issue and reduction goals should be shared <br /> across the aquifer. <br /> E An aggregate goal of at least seventeen percent reduction in water use was set without <br /> disclosing how the target goal was calculated. <br /> e The settlement addresses the North and East Groundwater Management Area (GWMA), stating <br /> the DNR agrees the entire North and East GWMA should use surface water instead of <br /> groundwater. This decision is not based on fact or data. The studies to support this claim have <br /> not been completed. An entire stakeholder process is currently underway to develop the North <br /> and East Groundwater Management Area plan and should be completed before being <br /> addressed in the settlement. <br /> Issue: <br /> In the past several years, White Bear Lake's water levels have been at the lower end of their historic <br /> range. Experts disagree about the fundamental causes of the low levels. The Minnesota Department of <br /> Natural Resources (DNR) was sued in Ramsey County District Court in 2012 (Court File No. 62-CV-13- <br /> 2414), with the plaintiffs (White Bear Lake Restoration Association and White Bear Lake Homeowners' <br /> Association) claiming that, by allowing thirteen local communities to use groundwater for their public <br /> water supply, the DNR has permitted too much groundwater use in the area, thus lowering White Bear <br /> P16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.