2015-06-24 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City of Centerville Council Meering Minutes June 10,2015 Mayor Wilharber provided Council Members with an opportunity to amend the presented minutes. Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Love,to approve the minutes of the May 27, 2015 City Council Meeting as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. VII. CONSENT AGENDA 1. City of Centerville May 28, 2015 through June 10, 2015 Claims (Check #29480-29507) &(Check#29508-29516) w/Voided Check#29517) 2. Centennial Lakes Police Department Claims through May 28, 2015 (Check #10394- 10407) 3. Centennial Fire District Claims through June 3, 2015 (Check#6970-6983) 4. Encroachment Agreement—Retaining Wall, 6727 Beaver Pond Way 5. Center Villa Second Addition(Mechanical Air Systems Purchase a. Resolution #15-OXX — Re-Affirming Final Plat and Authorizing the Mayor & City Clerk to Affix Their Signatures Upon the Approved Plat (Mylar) for the Center Villa Second Addition for Recording with the Anoka County Recorder's Office b. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation to Amend the Previously Submitted Conditional Use Permit—"3. Conditions. This permit is issued subject to the following conditions: a) This Conditional Use Permit is not authorized until and unless the Plat for Center Villa Second is properly recorded with Anoka County by June 30,2015 instead of May 25, 2015 6. Parks&Recreation Committee Recommendations to Expend Funds a. Electrical—Laurie LaMotte Memorial Picnic Pavilion/Shelter b. Drinking Fountain—Laurie LaMotte Memorial Park/Outside Warming House Mayor Wilharber provided Council Members an opportunity to pull items from the Consent Agenda for additional discussion. Mayor Wilharber requested that Items#4 &6 a.be pulled for additional discussion. Motion by Council Member King, seconded by Council Member Fehrenbacher, to approve Consent Agenda 1-3, and Item#5 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. Mayor Wilharber stated that he had driven by the home noticed that the retaining wall was already constructed and questioned its installation prior to the encroachment agreement. Staff reported that the residence was newly constructed, the buyer desired the ability to utilize the side garage door, and the builder thought the retaining wall would be covered under the original permit and did not consider the setback requirements until the Building Inspector informed him that in order for the retaining wall to remain an encroachment agreement would be needed. Motion by Council Member Fehrenbacher, seconded by Council Member Love to approve Consent Agenda Item#4 as presented. All in favor. Motion carried. Page 2of5 2