Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.. <br /> <br />. ~ <br /> <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />February 6, 2003 <br />Page Ten <br /> <br />Enterprise Funds <br /> <br />Water Fund <br /> <br />The results of the operations and cash position of the Water fund for the past three years are as follows: <br /> <br /> Percent Percent Percent <br /> of of of <br /> 2002 Total 2001 Total 2000 Total <br />Charges for services $ 158,122 100.0 $ 184,481 100.0% $ 146,321 100.0% <br />Operating expenses 117.477 74.3 154.722 83.9 85.511 58.4 <br />Operating income 40,645 25.7 29,759 16.1 60,810 41.6 <br />Nonoperating income 188.974 119.5 165.916 89.9 129.134 JU <br />Net income before transfer S 229.619 ~% S 195.675 ~% S 189.944 ~% <br />Cash balance, December 31 S 1.125.148 S 1.264.755 S 1.093.145 <br />Bonds payable S 237.750 S 267.000 S 294.000 <br />The hook-up fees generate revenue for expansion of the system. . These fees contributed to the majority ofthe'large cash <br />balance. The rates currently appeaJ.' adequate and are at a level sufficient to provide for the operation of the system. but <br />the City should evaluate them. annually. <br />Sewer Fund <br /> <br />The results of operations and cash position of the Sewer fund for the past three years are as follows: <br /> <br /> Percent Percent Percent <br /> of of of <br /> 2002 Total 2001 Total 2000 Total <br />Charges for services $ 248,113 100.0% $ 202,121 100.0% $ 181,415 100.0% <br />Operating expenses 212.867 ~ 188.248 J3J. 214.089 J18..Q <br />Operating income (loss) 35,246 14.2 13,873 6.9 (32,674 ) (18.0) <br />Nonoperating income 204.458 JM 187.036 92.5 215.656 118.9 <br />Net income before transfers S 239.704 ~% S 200.909 ~% S 182.982 ~% <br />Cash balance, December 31 S 1.835.677 S 1.818.376 S 1.669.712 <br />Bonds payable S 297.250 S 333.000 S 366.000 <br />The Sewer cash also is very high compared with operating expenses but hook-up fees have also been a major factor in <br />the increase. The operations before hook-up fees have been at a loss for several years unti12oo1. It is important that the <br />City review rates to ensure that the revenue is sufficient to cover operating expenses. As mentioned in the Water fund <br />analysis, the hook-up fees should be used for the expansion of the system. <br />