Laserfiche WebLink
<br />street at this time even though the assessment would be higher now; it may make seb.se if <br />the overall assessment for water at this time and street in a few years would be higher. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated she is not opposed to one or the other, but had only h~ the <br />figures for directional drilling and she would be interested in the figures for open.cu1;ting. <br />She . then said she would not like to have the roads tom up for a long period of time and <br />would prefer to keep the assessment as low as possible. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that Council needed better and J;nore <br />information on the open cutting option for street reconstruction prior to ro9king a <br />determination. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated that every time she hears the figures, they are increasing and it <br />makes her nervous because at the informational meeting, it was $5,100 and now 'it is <br />proposed for $12,000 for streets and water. Mayor Sweeney indicated the $5,100 for <br />water is still-the number one option; however, the City asked for more infolJIl.$tion <br />including the street reconstruction. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated the need for road repair would be caused by the development 8$ the <br />roads currently do not need repair. She then said that she feels the developer should pear <br />the cost of the road reconstruction and not the residents. She further commented that <br />most residents have. wells and do not need the improvements, but the developer dads to <br />make his money from the development <br /> <br />Mr. Schluender indicated the developer will be required to escrow monies for Mill ~oad <br />and Peltier Lake Road and those monies will be held for an overlay for any daxrlage <br />caused by the construction traffic. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated that Mill Road is starting to degrade and putting this kind of tntffic <br />on it will degrade it even faster. - I <br /> <br />1 <br />,..I-.l <br />j <br /> <br />i~._._; <br />. I <br /> <br />. ,- J <br />~ .. t <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley said she would appreciate spreading the cost of the road repair to !the <br />developer as he stands to make a lot of money. She then asked if it would be possible to <br />include the 13 households that were not included in the assessments to lower ithe <br />assessment overall for .the other residents. She further commented that the last. <br />assessment for water was $4,330 and theirs is $5,100. Ms. Moore-Sykes explained that <br />the assessment for the 13 homes that were not previously assessed would be very c1os~ to <br />that of the other residents for this project after inflation and said that it is not possiblo to <br />include those 13 residents to lower the assessment for the other 45. <br /> <br />Ms. Renee Lee, 7268 Clearwater Drive, asked why she had never seen anything ~ut <br />advertisements forbids on the project and asked where the numbers for the assessmetJ.ts <br />came from. Mayor Sweeney explained the figures are the Engineer's estimate. . <br /> <br />Page 7 of17 <br />