Laserfiche WebLink
Memorandum <br /> Date: October 27,2015 <br /> To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members <br /> From: City Administrator Mike Ericson <br /> RE: Appeal Report&Recommendation for dog"Rio" and Designation as Potentially <br /> Dangerous Dog <br /> RECOMMENDATION: The City Council should affirm the decision of the Police Department <br /> finding that the dog, "Rio"is a Potentially Dangerous Dog. <br /> REPORT: This report is a recap of the hearing held on October 15, 2015, with City Attorney <br /> Kurt Glaser, during which I heard testimony from CLPD Community Service Officer Joe <br /> Wressel, dog owner Mike Lee and his father Allen Lee. The victim Michael Sink was not <br /> present nor the witness Cory Anhalt. The meeting began at 5:30 p.m. I thanked the attendees and <br /> proceeded to hear from the witnesses. <br /> Officer Wressel provided a recap of the event which took place on September 16, 2015. The <br /> relevant facts of the case are not in question and are consistent with his police reports. Most <br /> importantly, the relevant facts of this incident are also consistent with the dog owner's version of <br /> the events. <br /> Dog owner Mike Lee explained that his father, Allen Lee was walking the dog on a lease when <br /> the incident took place. Both Mike and Allen acknowledged how the dog bit Michael Sink <br /> without provocation. Mr. Sink was transporting rocks in a wheelbarrow when the dog bit Mr. <br /> Sink in the leg. They believed the wheelbarrow must have frightened the dog. Both men stated <br /> that this is out of character for the dog. They believe he is not a dangerous or vicious dog. Mike <br /> apologized. He noted that all dogs have the potential to bite. He has walked the dog many times <br /> and this has never happened. Mike believed that if he had been walking the dog instead of his <br /> father, this would not have happened. Rio is a 6 %2 years old dog who was rescued from a puppy <br /> mill when he was 1 year old. The Lees challenged whether the dog should be designated as <br /> potentially dangerous. They did not challenge any of the criteria imposed on their dog should this <br /> designation be upheld. A few questions were asked and answered and all parties left. I stated <br /> that I would prepare a report and share it with Council at its next meeting. <br /> The standard for Potentially Dangerous Dog is defined in Section 90.10(a)(2) as an "animal <br /> which has ... when unprovoked by a victim, bites human or domestic animal while on public or <br /> private property." Based on the police reports, and listening to statements from Officer Wressel, <br /> Mike Lee, and Allen Lee, I have determined that the designation should be upheld because this <br /> dog, Rio is a Potentially Dangerous Dog. <br />