My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-11-04 P & R Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2015
>
2015-11-04 P & R Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2015 1:12:21 PM
Creation date
10/30/2015 1:11:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
14. Add "you are here" dots to the maps. <br /> Response: "You are here"references are typically included on trailhead maps out in the field. <br /> 15. Would a tunnel be feasible for Sunset/Elm,so you don't need so much ROW for the trail? <br /> Response: The County will investigate that option when funding is available. <br /> 16. Is there a way to partner on signage? <br /> Response: Yes, the County is more than happy to partner on trail signs. <br /> 17. Add some small parking lots along the trail. <br /> Response: While this option may be possible within County owned parkland, it would require <br /> additional right of way acquisition costs elsewhere along the trail corridor. The County feels that <br /> the existing retail areas and schools providing parking options along this trail and therefore does <br /> not feel this option is necessary for inclusion in this this trail master plan. <br /> 18. Clean the trails in the spring. <br /> Response: This comment was shared with county maintenance staff. <br /> 19. The biggest item in your propose budget is the bridge over 1-35W at Sunset. Sunset is a county <br /> road and it is in terrible shape.Can we assume that Sunset will soon be rebuilt. If so,will that <br /> bridge be replaced? Maybe a bike lane on a new Sunset/ 1-35 could be done at a more <br /> reasonable cost than the bridge you have pictured in your plan. <br /> Response:As outlined in the master plan, the County proposed to either include the trail when <br /> the existing vehicular bridge is reconstructed, or to provide a separate pedestrian bridge, if the <br /> trail cannot be included with the bridge reconstruction. <br /> 20. Could you use a decommissioned bridge for the ped bridge over 35W? <br /> Response:Any decommissioned bridge would need to be reviewed by a structural engineer prior <br /> to determining its use and approved by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the <br /> County Engineer. <br /> 21. Road and trail from 52 to Cloud Drive is scheduled for construction Fall 2016. <br /> Response:No response is required. <br /> 22. There is a potential K-4 school going in on the northwest corner of 17 and 109tH <br /> Response:This trail plan should not have an impact on future development in this area. <br /> 23. Infinity campus, located off of 109th is planning a major expansion. <br /> Response:The proposed trail should not have an impact the proposed expansion. <br /> 24. Have we considered using the Lexington/35W crossing instead of the Sunset/35W crossing? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.