My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-12-01 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2015
>
2015-12-01 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/25/2015 12:09:46 PM
Creation date
11/25/2015 12:08:19 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY OF CENTERVILLE <br /> PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <br /> Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held its regular <br /> meeting on Monday,November 2, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. <br /> PRESENT: Chairperson Darrin Mosher roved <br /> Commissioner Russ Koski APP <br /> Commissioner Matthew Montain <br /> Commissioner Mark Haiden NotCommissioner Nick Twohy <br /> ABSENT: Commissioner Tom Wood <br /> STAFF: City Administrator Mike Ericson <br /> City Engineer Mark Statz <br /> OTHERS PRESENT: Council Member D. Love <br /> I. CALL TO ORDER. The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairperson <br /> Mosher. <br /> 1. Roll Call <br /> II. APPEARANCES <br /> 1. Mr. & Mrs. Josh Dahl, 1634 Hunters Ridge Lane — Request Variance to Construct <br /> Screen Porch 2' within 10' Setback <br /> Mr. & Mrs. Josh Dahl appeared before the Commission requesting a variance to construct a screen <br /> porch two (2) feet within the required ten (10) foot setback. Mr. & Mrs. Dahl stated that they had <br /> been told by two (2) staff members that more than likely that their request would be denied as it <br /> did not meet the criteria for granting a variance; however, they determined that it would be best to <br /> speak with the Commission regarding their desire. <br /> Mr. Dahl stated that he had constructed the home following all setback requirements not taking <br /> into account an afterthought of desiring to construct a screened porch which he desired to <br /> encroach into the ten(10) foot side setback area by only two (2) feet. <br /> Lengthy discussion ensued regarding setback requirements, variance requirements, the property <br /> owners' responsibility for not creating their own hardship and the inability of the Commission to <br /> grant their request due to the latter. <br /> III. PUBLIC HEARING(S) <br /> The Chair opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. <br /> Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.