My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015-11-02 P & Z Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2015
>
2015-11-02 P & Z Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2015 9:15:25 AM
Creation date
12/8/2015 9:15:19 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />CITY OF CENTERVILLE <br />PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, the Planning and Zoning Commission held its regular <br />meeting on Monday, November 2, 2015 at 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />PRESENT: <br /> Chairperson Darrin Mosher <br /> Commissioner Russ Koski <br />Commissioner Matthew Montain <br />Commissioner Mark Haiden <br />Commissioner Nick Twohy <br /> <br />ABSENT: <br />Commissioner Tom Wood <br /> <br />STAFF: <br /> City Administrator Mike Ericson <br /> City Engineer Mark Statz <br /> <br />OTHERS PRESENT: <br /> Council Member D. Love <br /> <br />I. CALL TO ORDER. <br />The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairperson <br />Mosher. <br /> <br /> <br />1.Roll Call <br /> <br />II. APPEARANCES <br /> <br />1. Mr. & Mrs. Josh Dahl, 1634 Hunters Ridge Lane – Request Variance to Construct <br />Screen Porch 2’ within 10’ Setback <br /> <br />Mr. & Mrs. Josh Dahl appeared before the Commission inquiring about building a screen porch <br />two (2) feet within the required ten (10) foot setback. Mr. & Mrs. Dahl stated that they had been <br />told by two (2) staff members that more than likely that their request would be denied as it did not <br />meet the criteria for granting a variance; however, they determined that it would be best to speak <br />with the Commission regarding their desire. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahl stated that he had constructed the home following all setback requirements not taking <br />into account an afterthought of desiring to construct a screened porch which he desired to <br />encroach into the ten (10) foot side setback area by only two (2) feet. <br /> <br />Lengthy discussion ensued regarding setback requirements, variance requirements, the property <br />owners’ responsibility for not creating their own hardship and the inability of the Commission to <br />grant their request due to the latter. <br /> <br />III. PUBLIC HEARING(S) <br /> <br />The Chair opened the public hearing at 7:07 p.m. <br /> <br />Page 1 of 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.