My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-01-13 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2016
>
2016-01-13 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2016 4:37:17 PM
Creation date
1/8/2016 4:35:10 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br /> Council Meeting Minutes <br /> December 9,2015 <br /> IV. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATION <br /> As individuals presenting CenturyLink Franchise Agreement were delayed, the Council held the <br /> Public Hearing on Proposed Improvements—2016 Mill & Overlay Project at this time. <br /> 2. Public Hearing on Proposed Improvements—2016 Mill& Overlay Project <br /> Engineer Statz stated that the City published and mailed required notice for the public hearing <br /> and that it is the first of two (2) meetings that are required to take place; one (1) regarding the <br /> improvement itself and one (1) for the related assessments (MN State Statute 429). Engineer <br /> Statz stated that the scope of the project is a 1" mill and overlay within the Royal Meadows <br /> Development (Cardinal Drive, North, South and West Robin Lanes), Cottonwood Court, Deer <br /> Court, Hunters Trail, Meadow Circle, Meadow Court and a 2"mill and overlay on Mill Road. <br /> Engineer Statz stated that for the previous two (2) years the City has been utilizing the thin mill <br /> and overlay method rather than the seal coating method for street maintenance which has proven <br /> to be more cost effective and extends the roadway by preventing premature deterioration. <br /> Engineer Statz stated that if Council orders the proposed improvement benefiting/abutting <br /> property owners will receive a nominal assessment similar to years past ($500-$550); however, <br /> this meeting is not where Council will be accepting input regarding assessments. Council <br /> Member King questioned the proper time for public comment on the assessments and Engineer <br /> Statz stated that property owners would be receiving notice of that hearing dependent upon <br /> Council's direction this evening. <br /> Council Member Fehrenbacher stated that a thin mill and overlay project would delay a full <br /> reconstruction of a roadway by five (5) or more years and be similar to changing the oil in your <br /> automobile and much less expensive than a full reconstruction. Council Member Love <br /> questioned whether additional items would be addressed similar to previous mill and overlays. <br /> Engineer Statz stated that the City is being proactive on adjusting manholes and curb <br /> replacements in areas of pooling or breakage. Council Member Fehrenbacher also stated that <br /> with a mill and overlay project, Rice Creek Watershed District does not require rain gardens or <br /> other methods for water runoff that they would for a full reconstruction. <br /> Council Member Paar questioned Engineer Statz regarding bids and anticipated costs. Engineer <br /> Statz stated that he felt that the City received fair and competitive bids within the City budget. <br /> Mr. David Peyla, 7235 Mill Road stated that he felt that the previous two (2) mill and overlay <br /> projects have not extended the life of the roadway, construction equipment has caused premature <br /> damage to the existing roadway and questioned whether funds were in escrow to pay for the <br /> premature damage rather than placing the expense on property owners. Mr. Peyla questioned the <br /> basis for the decision on repairing the roadway. Engineer Statz stated that a 2" overlay would be <br /> utilized on the roadway as it has been some time since improvements have been made to it and it <br /> fits into the pavement maintenance schedule and compared to streets of similar age. Engineer <br /> Statz stated that any escrows from previous projects have been returned due to the completion of <br /> the development(s). Mr. Peyla also questioned drainage, curb and gutter concerns. Engineer <br /> Statz stated that the roadway is somewhat of a collector street, is considered to be more rural in <br /> Page 2 of 10 <br /> 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.