My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016-04-27 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2016
>
2016-04-27 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2017 8:43:19 AM
Creation date
4/22/2016 3:13:33 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
277
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Task 2 - Develop Budeet level Feasibility and Cost/Benefit Analyses <br />This will include the analysis of two options for consideration: <br />1. Jointly Planned, Constructed, and Operated Supply and Storage — This would <br />involve the creation of a joint entity whereby the supply and storage aspects of the joint <br />system are planned, constructed, and managed by the joint entity, with each City maintaining <br />the distribution systems within their own community. Water would be sold to each <br />community for resale to their respective customers under this scenario. <br />2. Jointly Planned, Constructed, and Operated Supply, Storage, and Distribution — This <br />would involve the creation of a joint entity that would construct and operate the entire water <br />system, including supply, storage, and distribution. <br />Technical <br />• Determine the capital improvements required to connect the communities together and create <br />a joint system, including timing <br />• Evaluate the implications of existing water treatment as applicable <br />• Estimate the cost of the infrastructure improvements <br />• Estimate the excess capacity in the joint system versus the separated systems <br />• Estimate the cost savings and added value of the joint system <br />• Identify options for an organizational structure of an entity to operate the joint facilities <br />Financial <br />• Develop preliminary alternatives for the allocation of both initial capital costs and cost of <br />water supply to each City for each option <br />• Review and discuss alternatives for financing anticipated capital improvements <br />• Consider the age of the infrastructure of the various cities in allocating capital costs to a rate <br />structure <br />• Determine rate impacts for the joint supply and joint supply/operation scenarios and compare <br />those to the current rates of each city <br />Task 3 — Prepare Joint Water System Feasibility Studs <br />A draft Joint Water Utility Feasibility Study will be prepared for review by representatives of the <br />six cities with technical and financial recommendations related to joint supply. A workshop will <br />be held with representatives of the six cities to review the draft Joint Water System Feasibility <br />Study reach a consensus on the allocation of costs. <br />Following the initial workshop, the Feasibility Study will be modified to incorporate the <br />comments into the final document as appropriate. <br />90 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.