Laserfiche WebLink
<br />,- <br /> <br />State Auditor Report on LGA <br /> <br />Page 1 of3 <br /> <br />.I <br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br /> <br />State Auditor Report on LGA <br /> <br />On Monday, Feb. 10, State Auditor Patricia Awada released a special report titled, Local Government <br />Aid and its Effect on Expenditures. <br /> <br />The report attempts to examine the relationship between local government aid (LGA) and city <br />spending, and concludes there is a causal link between spending patterns and the amount ofLGA <br />received. Although the focus of the report based on the title is the relationship of city spending and <br />LGA payments, the report makes a large jump by concluding with a recommendation to slash LGA <br />funding by 51 percent to cities over 2,500 population. <br /> <br />The auditor's LGA report is unique. The state auditor is generally charged with auditing local <br />government finances. This report goes far beyond the traditional role of the auditor and ventures into <br />the policy arena. <br /> <br />The League has serious concerns about the validity of the report's methodology as well as concerns <br />about the conclusions reached by the auditor. The report relies on an analysis of raw, per capita <br />financial data from the Office of the State Auditor to make broad conclusions about all cities' <br />circumstances as well to make policy recommendations that have city-specific impacts. <br /> <br />Unique, one-time circumstances--such as spending on flood and tornado damage or financial reporting <br />on joint-powers and other cooperative arrangements--have not been considered in the report. For <br />example, the city of Granite Falls 2001 expenditure data includes significant one-time spending in <br />response to the 2000 tornado and the 2001 floods. As a result, the city appears to be one of the highest <br />spending cities in the state. If cuts are made based on this data, the city of Granite Falls would be <br />penalized for responding to the community's disasters. <br /> <br />At this time, the impact of the report on legislative discussions is unclear. On Thursday, the Senate Tax <br />Committee will consider the report. The House has not yet scheduled a hearing, but will hold several <br />hearings next week to discuss the governor's yet-to-be-released budget proposal that will likely <br />included significant cuts in LGA and market value homestead credit. With these events on the horizon, <br />the report findings could find their way into the budget discussions. <br /> <br />Auditor's findings on spending and LGA <br />The report, which looks only at cities over 2,500 population, finds there is a relationship between city <br />spending levels and the distribution ofLGA- those cities that receive more LGA tend to spend more. <br />However, the report fails to acknowledge the different characteristics of individual communities that <br />likely have a more profound impact on city spending levels than the distribution of LGA. <br /> <br />For example, those cities that tend to receive the most LGA are generally older, fully developed <br />communities and regional centers that provide additional services such as libraries, airports, and a <br />higher level of parks and recreation services as well as redevelopment activities. In addition, other <br />cities that tend to receive more LGA are first-ring suburbs that have aging infrastructure and a greater <br />share of their property classified as tax exempt. <br /> <br />Essential services defined <br />In an attempt to suggest ways to cut LGA, the report divides city services into two broad categories: <br /> <br />http://www.1mnc.org/main/lmcstory 1.cfm <br /> <br />2/18/2003 <br />