My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017-02-08 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2017
>
2017-02-08 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/6/2017 12:31:32 PM
Creation date
2/2/2017 3:01:24 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1/17/2017 WHEN SHOULD YOU PURCHASE AN AERIAL LADDER?- Fire Engineering <br />SEARCH FOR ADDITIONAL CRITERIA <br />My search for additional criteria began in the same location at which many of our current standards <br />and recommendations began their lives: the old American Insurance Association (AIA) Bulletins. AIA <br />Special Interest Bulletin #69, "Fire Department Apparatus, Ladder and Elevating Platforms," addressed <br />the issue of the appropriate ratio of aerial ladders to pumpers. This was a complementary reference to <br />those remarks in the rating schedule that spoke of the need for a basic structural fire response of two <br />pumper companies and a ladder or service company. I then selected data that could help broaden the <br />basic requirements. <br />Some interesting clues related to the thinking of the individuals who developed this document were <br />detected by reading between the lines. Relating to building conditions in the years following the Civil <br />War, the bulletin stated: "As the height of buildings increased, it became evident that ladders long <br />enough to reach the upper floors could not be handled by hand alone." <br />This seemingly urban problem from the 1870s and 1880s led to the development of an elevating ladder <br />attached to a horse-drawn turntable vehicle. Thus, the aerial ladder was born. Undoubtedly, the debate <br />over which fire departments should have one began at that point. <br />Since the ISO grading schedule speaks to how a unit becomes a rated aerial company, its existence is <br />therefore acknowledged. And its guidelines give us a starting point. Unfortunately, we are still left with <br />the question of how to further justify such an acquisition. <br />JUSTIFYING AN ACQUISITION <br />Whether to purchase an aerial ladder seems to be a local decision based on local building conditions. <br />However, we have seen that many communities that did not need an aerial ladder had one and other <br />communities that desperately needed one could not get one. What then to do? <br />These concerns led me to additional research and the development of the rules, given below, for <br />determining if the acquisition of an aerial ladder or elevating platform device is warranted. <br />An aerial device is recommended when a number of buildings within the jurisdiction appear to be <br />beyond the reach of existing fire department ground ladders. This recommendation is not only based <br />on ISO recommendations but is a basic common-sense concept. If a significant number of your <br />buildings are beyond the reach of your ground ladders, you had better do something about it. <br />The number of buildings beyond the reach of ground ladders in itself is not an absolute criterion; its <br />significance will vary from community to community. For example, consider two communities, each of <br />which has 15 buildings beyond the reach of a standard 35 -foot portable ladder. The first is a farming <br />community, and all 15 structures are barns or silos. The other community contains a series of <br />file:///C:/Users/Harlan/Dropbox/My%20documents/Centennial%20Fire/W HEN%20SHOULD%20YOU%20PURCHASE%20AN%20AERIAL%20LADDER_%2... 2/5 <br />75 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.