Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />May 10, 2017 <br />Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to table <br />the final payment to Anoka County until the next council meeting schedule for Mav <br />24, 2017. All in favor. Motion carried. <br />3. Met. Council (MCES) Flow Rate Follow -Up <br />Administrator Ericson stated that the City is in receipt of Mr. Kyle Colvin's responses to <br />questions Council had at a previous Council meeting (February 8, 2017). Administrator <br />Ericson stated that Engineer Statz addressed several of the questions that Council had and <br />provided clarification for several items of concern. <br />Engineer Statz stated that Council's concerns were addressed and that Mr. Colvin will be <br />addressing additional items in the next few weeks as the 2016 flows have not been <br />finalized. He also stated that in Mr. Colvin's email, MCES will be changing their <br />allocation model for 2017 so he will address those questions then. <br />Council Members were disappointed in the amount of time Mr. Colvin took to address <br />their concerns, had concerns for infiltration and sump pump discharge, along with <br />grading and procedures for ensuring that grade of lot is maintained. Council Member <br />King questioned the readings and monitoring of lift stations by Met. Council and <br />Engineer Statz stated that he believed their systems were automated but he would <br />research this item. Discussion ensued regarding ensuring that residents are pumping their <br />discharge to their rear yard rather than their floor drains or laundry tubs, inspections, <br />fines and review of the City Code. <br />No action was taken by Council. <br />X. NEW BUSINESS <br />1. 1688 Heritage Street — Culvert Removal <br />Administrator Ericson stated that with the Centerville Road project a culvert at this <br />address was abandoned. Engineer Statz stated that Staff has been visually inspecting the <br />culvert in the driveway since the project and believe that it should be removed and the <br />homeowner made whole. He stated that there has been a hump in the driveway from the <br />culvert since the street was originally constructed and believes that the City should <br />remove it. <br />Council Members had concerns regarding obtaining bids if needed, coordination with the <br />owner's replacement of the driveway and costs incurred by the City. <br />Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Montain to <br />Approve the Removal of the Storm Pipe ($3,750) and Reimburse the Homeowner <br />the Cost to Repave the Area or Pave the Area (Owners Preference) With Staff <br />Informing the Property Owner. All in favor. Motion carried. <br />Page 4 of 8 <br />