2017-06-06 P & Z Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Jacobson Environmental, Environmental Consultants 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com The precipitation for the previous three worksheet data was as follows: Aug July Worksheet (Wks) 4.89' 2.15 30% less than 2.94 2.90 30% more than 4.74 4.73 www.jacobsonem Wayne Jacobson, ------------------------- i Center, MN 55430 along with the compai ne 1 .55 " NWS Data W, ►e nonmen Isom ',S.S., W. C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ----------- ------------------------ ;(612) 802-6619 Cell of the 0/23/14 precipitation 2014 Wks Interpret Wet DryA3)et Multi -month score (3`3) + (2'1) + = 14 Normal (10 to 14 b ing normal) The delineation was performed on Septen period affected the boundary of any wetlai the methodology as presented in Appendi delineation was performed and reported b #30611, Society of Wetland Scientists — P BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified #101 #A-171. Methodology )er 23, 201L and it is unlik is in this delineation, sino A. Precipitation data is Ic Wayne Jacobson, Minne: )fessional Wetland Scient , American Fisheries Soci The wetlands on the subject property wero delineated using the routin forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engir eers Wetlands Delineation determined through a routine analysis of tl a vegetation, soils and hyd characteristics in order for an area to bedelineated as a wetland. We or inundated with surface and or groundwE ter at a frequency and dura under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation ty conditions. Examples of wetlands includeeasonally flooded basins, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamp wooded swamps, fens, ar Vegetation ly the precipitation totals in this the period as normal according to ated in Appendix A. This wetland )ta Professional Soil Scientist t *1000, Ur iversity of Minnesota / ty — Associate Fisheries Scientist determine ion methodology set lanual. W tland boundaries were Ipgy whit must all show wetland Inds are a eas that are saturated :ilt sufficie t to support, and that dally adap ed for life in hydric soil )Odplain fo ests, wet meadows, bogs. The plant species within the parcel were ctalogued and assigned a w§tlrand indictor status according to Lichvar, R.W., Butterwick, N.C. Melvin, anl W.N Kirchner, 2014. The National W�t/and Plant List: 2014 Update of Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 014-41: 1-4.2. In the text of this report and on the enclos d data forms, the plant indi ator status follows the plant's scientific name unless a status has not beon assigned. The hydrophyt c plant crit rion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species b the 50/20 rule for each str tum (herb, hrub/sapling tree, and woody vine) were assigned an obligate (OL)', facultative wet (FACW , and/or facultative (FAC) wetland status. ' OBL=Obligate Wetland, occurs an estimated 67%-99% probability of occurrence in wetland wetlands, 34%-66% probability. FACU=Facul probability. UPI..=Upland, almost never occurs information available to determine an indicator toward higher (+) or lower (-) frequency of occ Wetland Delineation -Mitigation -Permitting - Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's Pond & Lake Weed Control & Fish Stockinc 9% in wetlands. FACW=Fa< FAC=Facultative, is equall ttive Upland, occurs in weth n wetlands, <1% probability ;tatus. Positive or negative s rrence with an category. lonitoring-Banking-Functic Soil ID -Soil Analysis & Del Tree Surveys -Natural Res Itative WellInd' has an estimated likely to oc r in wetlands and non - Js only occa ionally, 1%-23% 41= No Indi lator, insufficient n previously indicated a frequency ali Ana lysis -T& E Surveys 2 e�tion-Envi onmental Referrals irge Management Plans