Laserfiche WebLink
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />City of Centerville, Minnesota <br /> <br />We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial statements of <br />the governmental activities, the business-type activities, each major fund and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of <br />Centerville, Minnesota (the City), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, and the related notes to the financial statements, <br />and have issued our report thereon dated March 26, 2015. <br /> <br />The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, promulgated by the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota <br />Statute §6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of <br />interest, public indebtedness, claims and disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our study included all <br />of the listed categories except that we did not test for compliance in tax increment financing because the City has not established a tax <br />increment financing district. <br /> <br />In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the provisions <br />of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, except as noted on the Schedule of Findings and <br />Responses as finding 2014-001. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward procedures, other matters may have come to <br />our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. Accordingly, had we performed additional <br />procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the City’s noncompliance with the above referenced provisions. <br /> <br />The City’s response to the finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings and Responses. The <br />City’s response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we <br />express no opinion on them. <br /> <br />This report is intended solely for the information and use those charged with governance and management of the City and the State <br />Auditor and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. <br /> <br />ABDO, EICK & MEYERS, LLP <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />March 26, 2015 <br /> <br />-81- <br /> <br />