Laserfiche WebLink
<br />j\ <br />" <br /> <br />M' <br />~e"w. <br />· :rno,~" <br /> <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members <br /> <br />FROM: Teresa Bender, City Clerk <br /> <br />SUBJECT: 7046 Brian Drive - Special Assessments (Clearwater Meadows - Water <br />Services - 1996) <br /> <br />DATE: December 8, 2004 <br /> <br />Subsequent to the Public Hearing on November 29, 2004 additional research was <br />completed regarding the Johnson's previous specia1 assessment and the Clearwater <br />Meadows Development of 1996. <br /> <br />I reviewed the original Developer's Agreement between the City of Centerville and <br />Rocky Goertz, attached is a copy. The only reference to the Johnson's property is on <br />Page 9, in regards to Outlot B and deeding same to the Johnson's, attached is an <br />unexecuted copy. Page 2 refers to the Developer's Improvements as being sanitary <br />sewer, water, distribution piping, storm sewer, urban street and sidewalk: under the 429 <br />process. <br /> <br />Water services were brought done Brian Drive as a part of the project; however, records <br />do not indicate that Rocky Goertz was responsible for any expenses other than within the <br />Clearwater Meadows development. <br /> <br />On December 2, 1996, near the same time as the certified special assessments for the <br />above stated project were to be placed on county records, the Johnson's combined what <br />appears to be Outlot B (pIN #23-31-22-14-0054) &, PIN #23-31-22-14-0015 which the <br />County issued a new PIN #23-31-22-14-0057. The County inactivated PIN #'s 23--31..22- <br />14-0054 and 23-31-22-14-0015 and did not move the assessments accordingly. There <br />was also an additional problem with the County and not issuing two (2) fund numbers for <br />the project becaJlse Resolution #96-36 discusses two (2) different assessment lengths and <br />interest rates, see attached. <br /> <br />Rocky Goertz' project involved 33 properties all ~ $13,310.72 and have been <br />paid Nme (9) additional properties were assessed. (The Johnson's being one (1) of <br />these nine (9)). Due to the previously stated errorftom above, the Johnson's are the only <br />property that have not paid or was not been certified with this project. I have attached the <br />assessment schedules for these properties. <br /> <br />Below, please find the parcel numbers and status of the nine (9) properties: <br />