Laserfiche WebLink
<br />NOV-17-2e04 15:32 <br /> <br />P.03/04 <br /> <br />."--' <br /> <br />Rice Creek Watershed District staff'~""'end the Stable stream rehabllitationmetbod.. <br />Analysis of the compadson effectiveness values between tbe'fOl2r options sb.ow that the <br />Stable streaJn rehabilitation option has: <br /> <br />. Neutml to good flood mitigation . <br />· Good expectations for msQ~CO costs (Lower) <br />· Neutnd to good future stormwater conveyauoo <br />· . Good expectations for biologic condi;tions <br />· Good ex.pectatlODS for downsnam water quality <br />· Neutral to good expecta:dO!lS for impacts to wetlands (lower impacts) <br />· Neutral to good expectations for cost (less expensive) <br />· And neutta1. in terms of project tlmf1\g of implerTlentation :in 2004 <br /> <br />. <br />Although the JD2/Harc1wood Creek Rehabilitation Project does not o:ffect Lino I.a.ba <br />geognphically. the creek watershed is very large. (Attachmeut 1) An esmnAted 30% of <br />tho nutrients entotiDg Peltier Lake, and other Lakes in. the Rice Creek Chain of Lakes <br />Park are from ID2. All options other than the Stable S1ream rehabilitation offer neu.1ral to <br />pOOr expectations for biologic ccm~ODS and down stream water quality. <br /> <br />..,......... OPTIONS: <br />1. Approve R.esolution'No. 04-173 <br />2. Do Not Approve <br /> <br />JECOMMENDATlONS~ <br />Option 1 <br />Attachments. <br />1. Map of ID2IHardwood Creek Watershed <br />2~ Resolution No. 04-173 . <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />-41- <br />