My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-05-01 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2018
>
2018-05-01 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2018 10:21:22 AM
Creation date
4/30/2018 8:36:01 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF CENTERVILLE REQUEST <br /> FOR COMMISSION ACTION <br /> entero (fe <br /> E77 <br /> Agenda Item# Department: Requested Meeting Date: <br /> Administration 5/1/2018 <br /> TITLE OF ISSUE: <br /> Fruth/Fischer Property Development <br /> BACKGROUND AND SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: <br /> Diamondview Partners, LLC has requested review of a Concept Plan for development of the Fruth/Fischer <br /> properties, two adjacent 10 acre parcels on the east side of Old Mill Road, abutting the northern city limits. The <br /> development lies just west of the Peltier Estates development, also, initially proposed by Diamondview. The <br /> property is currently zoned R-1. It was given contingent rezoning several months ago, but conditions of that <br /> action were not met, so we would view the property as still being R-1. For concept plans, we do not charge the <br /> developer for the review, and therefore, do not engage our consultants. However, a cursory review by city staff <br /> offers a few comments: Proposed layout appears to meet R-2A. Wetland impact is minimal. A connection to <br /> Revoir St. should be made. Connection of the two cul-de-sacs should be considered, with possible <br /> disconnection of one of the entrances onto Old Mill Rd. Curvelinear elements to streets should be considered. <br /> COST AND SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING: <br /> No Cost <br /> REQUESTED ACTION: <br /> Review and discussion of Concept Plan. The commission may wish to give the developer some non-binding, <br /> general comments. No official action requested. <br /> For Clerk's Use: <br /> SUPPORTED DOCUMENTS ATTACHED <br /> Motion By: <br /> Resolution Ordinance Contract Minutes Plan Map <br /> Second By: <br /> X <br /> Vote Record: A e Nay <br /> Mosher Other(specify) <br /> Haiden <br /> T- ohy <br /> Ganzel <br /> Broussard Vickers <br /> Refer to: <br /> Consent Tabled Until: <br /> Other: <br /> Regular <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.