My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-07-11 P & R Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2018
>
2018-07-11 P & R Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2018 2:02:25 PM
Creation date
7/6/2018 2:00:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br /> Parks&Recreation Committee <br /> June 6,2018 <br /> V. COMMITTEE BUSINESS (NEW) -NONE <br /> 1. Review Draft Anoka County Parks System Master Plan <br /> Council liaison, Montain, questioned when the snowmobile trail along Main Street, <br /> through the city had been eliminated. The Master Plan does not show this route as a <br /> designated snowmobile trail. Staff will ask Anoka County to verify that this route no <br /> longer exists. No formal action was taken. <br /> 2. Additional Material Available for Sledding Hill <br /> Administrator/Engineer Statz explained that an adjacent street project planned in Lino <br /> Lakes will have some excavated material that would be available for the sledding hill, if <br /> the committee wished to expand the hill either higher or wider. He further explained that <br /> restoration costs may or may not make it worthwhile for the contractor to deposit the <br /> material at that location. The consensus of the committee was that if the material could be <br /> placed and turf restored at no cost, they would accept up to 500 cubic yards to make the <br /> hill a bit taller, and wider on top. <br /> 3. Discussion of Land versus Park Dedication Fees (Fruth/Fischer Concept Plan) <br /> Administrator/Engineer Statz explained that the two lots shown on the east side of the <br /> concept plan may be difficult to develop due to long driveways, zoning code issues, and <br /> utility extensions. The lots, if developed, would be very valuable to the developer, but it <br /> is up to the city as to whether or not to require land dedication or payment of Park <br /> Dedication Fees on each development. With the current proposal, the Park Dedication <br /> Fees would be approximately $100,000. Accepting the area where these two homes are <br /> proposed, as a park, would replace the $100,000 payment. The staff memo in the packet <br /> had asked the committee to discuss whether accepting this area as park land would be <br /> considered, perhaps for a dog park or other passive uses. Discussion ensued on the need <br /> for a dog park,the availability of other local dog parks,the need for and expense of fencing, <br /> the difficult access for maintenance, the lack of parking and who would pay for a potential <br /> boardwalk system. Additional discussion was had regarding the Park Fund's debt and the <br /> need to pay that down, as well as have funds for other capital projects. <br /> Motion by Committee Member Peterson, seconded by Committee Member Bettinger <br /> to request Park Dedication Fees in lieu of land dedication for the Fruth/Fischer <br /> development. 4 members in favor; Committee Member Errickson-Grahek abstains. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> IV. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES <br /> 1. May 2, 2018 Parks and Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.