My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-09-26 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2018
>
2018-09-26 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2018 10:51:19 AM
Creation date
9/25/2018 10:47:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Water Supply Plan—Centerville <br /> Treatment and storage capacity versus demand <br /> It is recommended that total storage equal or exceed the average daily demand. <br /> Discuss the difference between current storage and treatment capacity versus the water supplier's <br /> projected average water demand over the next 10 years (see Table 7 for projected water demand): <br /> Well 2 has a capacity of 1.51 MGD which exceeds the projected 2025 maximum day demand of <br /> 0.93 MGD and the 2040 maximum day demand of 0.97 MGD. Well 1 is a backup well that could be used <br /> in an emergency to supply 0.86 MGD which would be supplemented with the interconnection to City of <br /> Lino Lakes to cover maximum day demand. A new well is not planned; instead, Well 1 will be <br /> redeveloped and returned to active status. <br /> The existing storage volume of 0. 5 MG exceeds the projected 2025 average day demand of 0.31 MGD <br /> and the 2040 average day demand of 0.32 MGD. No additional water storage is needed. <br /> C. Water Sources <br /> Complete Table 6 by listing all types of water sources that supply water to the system, including <br /> groundwater, surface water, interconnections with other water suppliers, or others. Provide the name <br /> of each source (aquifer name, river or lake name, name of interconnecting water supplier) and the <br /> Minnesota unique well number or intake ID, as appropriate. Report the year the source was installed or <br /> established and the current capacity. Provide information about the depth of all wells. Describe the <br /> status of the source (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection) and if the <br /> source facilities have a dedicated emergency power source.Add rows to the table as needed for each <br /> installation. <br /> Include copies of well records and maintenance summary for each well that has occurred since your last <br /> approved plan in Appendix 1. <br /> Table 6.Water sources and status <br /> I <br /> 1 r <br /> Groundwater PDC-Jordan Well 1-511091 1988 600 267 Emergency No <br /> Groundwater PDC-Jordan Well 2-512748 1993 1,050 187 Active No <br /> Interconnection Lino Lakes 2,000 - Emergency No power needed. <br /> Limits on Emergency Interconnections <br /> Discuss any limitations on the use of the water sources (e.g. not to be operated simultaneously, <br /> limitations due to blending, aquifer recovery issues etc.) and the use of interconnections, including <br /> capacity limits or timing constraints (i.e. only 200 gallons per minute are available from the City of Prior <br /> Lake, and it is estimated to take 6 hours to establish the emergency connection). If there are no <br /> limitations, list none. <br /> Emergency interconnection with Lino Lakes can supply up to 2,000 gpm. Connection includes a pressure <br /> sustaining valve in case of low pressure on the supply side. <br /> 7 <br /> 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.