2018-09-26 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Local Water Supply Plan—Centerville Elm i I I 1 ( J f1 0 Aquifer Prairie du Q Flow/water level ❑GIS analysis Established ❑ Revise Implement Chien decline ❑ Modeling threshold permit conservation Jordan ❑ Degrading water ❑ Mapping guideline is Q Change measures and quality trends and/or 0 Monitoring water level drop groundwater work with MCLS exceeded 0 Aquifer testing no more than pumping partners(DNR, ❑ Impacts on ❑ Other: half of the Q Increase Met Council, endangered,threatened, available head. conservation Anoka County, or special concern Monitor for long ❑ Other and neighboring species or habitat. term water level communities to decline. prevent reaching threshold. ❑ Endangered, threatened,or special concern species habitat, other Natural resource impacts * Examples of thresholds: a lower limit on acceptable flow in a river or stream; water quality outside of an accepted range; a lower limit on acceptable aquifer level decline at one or more monitoring wells; withdrawals that exceed some percent of the total amount available from a source; or a lower limit on acceptable changes to a protected habitat. Wellhead Protection (WHP)and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans Complete Table 11 to provide status information about WHP and SWP plans. The emergency procedures in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions required in the Minnesota Department of Health's (MDH)Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan and Surface Water Protection (SWP) Plan. Table 11.Status of Wellhead Protection and Source Water Protection Plans HE ❑ In Process WHP Oprogress)Completed 2007 (Updated plan in 11 Not Applicable progress) ❑ In Process SWP ❑Completed NA NA 0 Not Applicable WHP—Wellhead Protection Plan SWP—Source Water Protection Plan 12 57