My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-10-02 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2018
>
2018-10-02 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/2/2018 2:04:30 PM
Creation date
10/2/2018 2:02:52 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
detached single-family development. As result,the City can focus mnthe vacant agricultural property <br /> with the Medium Density Residential and if it wishes, could revise the proposed allowed density. <br /> For context,the Watermark development has a net density of 3.40 units/acre. VVealso surveyed I840 <br /> Comprehensive Plans of neighboring communities and found the following proposed ranges for medium <br /> density residential: <br /> * H«0» <br /> o Medium 3'6 units per net acre (up tnO units per net acre with a PUD) <br /> * Lino Lakes <br /> o Medium 4.0tn5.9 units per acre <br /> * Forest Lake <br /> o Low-Medium: 3 to 6 units per acre <br /> o Medium 6 t 10 units per acre <br /> * Blaine <br /> o Low-Medium: 2.5 to 12 units per acre <br /> o Medium: 6-12 units per acre <br /> * Shoreview <br /> o Medium:4tnO units per acre <br /> * VadnaisHei0hts <br /> o Medium: Stn9 units per acre <br /> Recommendation <br /> Currently, Staff iarecommending that the Planning Commission and City Council have a discussion <br /> regarding the medium density residential district and its allowed density range. Staff has provided <br /> proposed revised densities and iasupportive mfareduction inthe allowed density based mnthe <br /> following: <br /> l. Development mfthe Waterworks site. <br /> 2. Based on the forecast provided by the Metropolitan Council the City is not under any additional <br /> pressure tmallow added density. <br /> S. Comment provided from the City mfLino Lakes regarding adjacent land uses. <br /> 4. UmpDcatimnfor Park Dedication Fees, SAC/WAC, etc. <br /> 5. Review of actual densities for Low Density developments in process in Centerville and Lino <br /> Lakes. <br /> G. Review mfneighboring cities "medium density" ranges. <br /> 7. Centervi||e'a PUD ordinance a||mwa flexibility to permit higher densities than would otherwise be <br /> permitted. <br /> Staff would recommend a revised allowed density ranges aafollows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.