My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019-10-09 CC Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2023
>
2019
>
2019-10-09 CC Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/14/2019 3:54:52 PM
Creation date
11/14/2019 3:54:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />October 9, 2019 <br /> <br />it is estimated that the annual tax increment revenue of $100,189 would be within the first <br />year or upon completion of the development. She said that this figure is calculated by the <br />following factors: the estimated market value after completion, classification of the <br />property being 4a (market-rate apartments), the net capacity value of the TIF District being <br />set based on the current market value of the property for taxes payable in 2019 (property’s <br />taxable market value multiplied by the relevant class rate set by state statute). Ms. Omdal <br />stated that for the reports the estimated local tax rate of 134.74% in the TIF Plan is based <br />on tax rates for taxes payable in 2019, includes the City, County, School and other taxing <br />jurisdictions tax rates pursuant to the provisions in the TIF Act and is used to estimate <br />future tax increments. Once requested to certify the TIF District, the County Auditor is <br />anticipated to utilize the local tax rate for taxes payable in 2020 due to timing. She also <br />stated that the actual estimated market value of the property will be set by the Assessor <br />upon completion of construction. <br /> <br />She reviewed the estimated project costs of $350,000 for the land; $33,840 for construction <br />of affordable housing; $350,160 for improvements related to adjacent public streets, trail <br />re-route/extension, public boulevard improvements; and utilities $616,000. She stated that <br />the City has the right to reserve 10% of the increment to reimburse itself for administrative <br />expenses but may agree to a lesser amount of 5%, reimbursement of project costs would <br />be on a pay-go basis which is bonded indebtedness and not the same as a General <br />Obligation Bond. She said that the City could loan or advance money from its General <br />Fund or any other fund to finance administrative costs associated with the TIF District to <br />reimburse itself with a portion of the tax increments collected. She stated that the plan <br />provides for up to $70,967 in these costs. She reported that the duration of the TIF District <br />could be 26 years but staff is recommending 20. She also stated that the estimated first <br />receipt of tax increment would be July, 2022 and would end December 31, 2041. <br /> <br />Ultimately, the base-line conclusion of Ms. Omdal’s analysis is that but for this financial <br />assistance, this project would not go forward. This finding is a necessary prerequisite for <br />the establishment of the TIF District. <br /> <br />Council Member Love questioned the maximum amount the City would have to pay would <br />be $1.35 million and the 20 year period and whether that was an either or whichever comes <br />first. Ms. Omdal stated that there is not yet an agreement with the developer but that is the <br />planning number. If it were to go forward as planned, the City would agree to pay $1.35 <br />million of actual project costs from 95% of the tax increment generated and if everything <br />went as outlined in plan which she stated it would not, it would take 20 years to reimburse <br />the developer. If the increment is more than $100,189 per year you would pay it off sooner <br />and decertify the district earlier. She stated that if the increment is less, the City would not <br />pay the developer more than collected and the City would not exceed the 20 years per the <br />agreement. She also stated that City would not be obligated to pay more than collected. <br />He also questioned the “area wide” regarding median income. Ms. Omdal stated the rates <br />are published by the Federal Government, published by area annually and the metro area <br />is $100,000 and each year it changes. <br /> <br />Finance Director DeJong stated it is called the Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area or <br />the 7-county metro area. <br />Page 3 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.