My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-01-08 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2020
>
2020-01-08 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/6/2020 2:27:34 PM
Creation date
1/6/2020 2:27:28 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />November 13, 2019 <br /> <br />due to weather delays. He stated that both he and City Attorney Glaser were comfortable with <br />granting the extension until June, 2020. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Montain, seconded by Council Member Koski to Grant the <br />Extension of the Installation of the Above Stated Items Until June, 2020. All in favor. Motion <br />carried. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that there may have been clarification needed for the wording of the <br />item placed on the agenda. He stated that he is requesting that the Council consider authorizing <br />Staff, the consultant (Northland Securities) and the TIF Attorney (Mary Ipple) to draft a TIF <br />Developer Agreement at a cost not to exceed $7,500. He stated that this would continue the <br />processes needed to further the proposed 53 unit apartment building if that was the desire of <br />Council as he felt that the expenditures were significant if Council did not desire to further the <br />project. He stated that Mr. Patrick Brama, Trident Development was in attendance to answer <br />questions this evening. <br /> <br />Mayor Paar asked Attorney Glaser for clarification. Attorney Glaser stated that if Council desire <br />to go forward with TIF this item would need to be discussed and if Council was against offering <br />TIF this would not make sense to authorize. However, at this time it is not authorizing TIF. <br /> <br />Council Member Lakso asked whether these costs could be placed against or negotiated with the <br />Developer or whether they were reimbursable. City Administrator Statz stated that the costs could <br />be negotiated.. Council Member Love inquired about the differences in what has been presented <br />by Northland Securities to date and this agreement. City Administrator Statz stated that this would <br />performa and the details of the proposed TIF deal. <br /> <br />Council Member Montain felt that consensus should be reached prior to drafting an agreement. <br />Administrator Statz stated that the agreement would provide for details and if Council choses after <br />the agreement to scrap the project that can be done. He stated that this offers Council an <br />opportunity to explore the options available. Mayor Paar stated that it does not mean a 20 year <br />TIF project is approved it is obtaining additional facts and allowing Council to make a much wiser <br />decision. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Love, seconded by Council Member Lakso to Authorize the <br />and Montain opposed. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Mayor Paar stated that Council will determine whether the project should be funded with TIF, the <br />years for the TIF, dollar amount of the TIF and concessions if determined at a later date. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the previously discussed scenario of 20 years, 95% paid by developer, <br />5% retained by City with the present value of 1.35 million, pay as go and conservative assumptions <br />that taxes would increase and pay off would be prior to the 20 years. Several Council Members <br />desired to negotiate optional scenarios going forward. <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.