My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-02-26 CC WS, Meeting & Closed Exec. Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2023
>
2020
>
2020-02-26 CC WS, Meeting & Closed Exec. Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2020 6:39:10 AM
Creation date
5/18/2020 6:39:06 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />February 26, 2020 <br /> <br />(short side) and 20% side yard (long side). The benefit test is whatever assessment <br />your property receives it will increase the value of your property. He stated the <br />deferments are allowed by law if you are 65 years old and older, disabled, and/or <br />active in the military. He stated that during this deferral period interest is accrued. <br />He explained the procedure for appealing the assessment this evening and outlined <br />the necessity to file with the district court within 30 days of the hearing if someone <br />intended to follow through with the appeal. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that in previous projects in 2009 (Peltier Lake Drive) the <br />homeowners were assessed averages of $6,884 and in 2013 (Center Street) were <br />assessed $4,141. The proposed 2020 Downtown Street Assessment on an average <br />residential lot would be approximately $5,298. The percentage of costs that were <br />assessed in 2009 was 29% and the 2013 was 25%. He stated that the 2009 and 2013 <br />project assessment terms were 15 years at 4% interest. The percentage of the project <br />costs to be assessed for the 2020 Downtown is going to be at 20% with a 15 year <br />term and interest rate at 3.5%. He stated that all projects are front-foot assessment <br />basis per policy, which mean 100% of the front yard (short side) and 20% of the <br />side yard (long side). <br /> <br />Administrator Statz reported that the proposed 2020 assessments for <br />commercial/institutional/vacant lots are as follows: 50% of the project costs and <br />terms are also 15 years at 3.5%. He stated that the front-foot assessment is based <br />per policy at 100% of the front yard (short side) and 20% of the side yard (long <br />side). The amount of the assessments were mailed and these dollar amounts cannot <br />increase. The amounts can be prepaid any time before the next year with full <br />interest being applied. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that the City’s current water connection rules are that if <br />you sell your home, add a major addition or your well falls into disrepair in an <br />amount that exceeds $1,500 connection is required. <br /> <br />Administrator Statz stated that the connection fees if you choose to connect to city’s <br />water system would be $8,000 for Lateral Benefit Fee (connecting to watermain in <br />the street), $1,850 Water Access Charge (WAC) (water tower, wells, etc.), <br />approximately $450 for a water meter, and whatever it costs for the plumber to <br />connect from the curb stop to your home. The costs can be assessed at the same <br />terms as the street project and a grant is available for income qualifying households. <br />He stated that the grant is only for owner occupied, single-family homes. He also <br />stated that this information was forwarded to property owners in December with <br />the deadline being extended to March 13. He stated that those that income qualify, <br />would have their costs for hooking to city water paid in full. <br /> <br />Council Member Koski stated that he understands that this is an area that has <br />experienced street deterioration for some time, that assessments are difficult while <br />living on a tight budget and felt that the project could no longer be delayed. He felt <br />that with the opportunity for CDBG funding it was a good opportunity to commence <br />the project. He understands that assessments are very difficult, would like to lower <br />Page 4 of 13 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.