Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />~;'tervi[[e <br /> <br />'EstaEfisn cc{ 1857 <br /> <br />1880 :Main Street, Centervi[fe, :Jvt2V 55038 <br />651-429-3232 or p~ 651-429-8629 <br /> <br />Date <br /> <br />DRAFT <br /> <br />Doug Fischer <br />County Engineer <br />Anoka County Highway Dept. <br />1440 Bunker Lake Blvd. NW <br />Andover, :MN 55304 <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Fischer: <br /> <br />We have reviewed the draft joint powers agreement and found several things of concern. <br /> <br />1) The first item and perhaps of greatest concern is the inclusion of storm drainage <br />system costs in the JPA The memorandum of agreement did not include this <br />item and the cost estimate didn't give a hint that you might be looking for <br />participation. We cannot accept this afterthought. It is outrageous to expect to <br />now allocate these costs-we will not pay for drainage system costs. <br />2) We have inserted on Page 4 the same language that was in the MOD that indicates <br />Anoka County's intention to secure reimbursement for the trail costs from Metro <br />Parks Trail Program. <br />3) We deleted city participation in the mobilization and field office. These items <br />were not contemplated by the MOD and in fact were specifically allocated to the <br />County in Exhibit C ofthe MOD. <br />4) We deleted city participation in traffic control for the same reason as <br />mobilization. <br />5) We have offered alternative schedule for payment of the City's share. We will <br />provide 20% at bid award and 75% on June 1, 2007, as long as the bulk of <br />Centerville costs are still planned to occur in 2007. Specifically if the downtown <br />area were delayed to 2008, then we would not pay those costs until closer to the <br />expected construction. <br />6) We deleted the engineering reimbursement for considering alternative designs on <br />CSAH 54. If you expected to be reimbursed, you should have indicated that at the <br />time those discussions were taking place. <br />7) We inserted in section V. B that the City would receive a credit of $150,000 in <br />providing alternative pond locations which only happened because of the City's <br />insistence thus saving the county at least three times that amount. <br /> <br />9~ <br />