My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020-06-10 CC Minutes - Approved
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2023
>
2020
>
2020-06-10 CC Minutes - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2021 10:50:47 AM
Creation date
2/17/2021 10:50:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />June 10, 2020 <br /> <br />the drainage should be minimal due to the revisions. Administrator Statz stated that Building A & <br />C would have doors on both sides of the building and Building B would not have access from the <br />south and doors only on one (1) side. Council Member Wilharber asked if there was an office <br />located on site. Administrator Statz stated no and there would be no running water or sewer. He <br />reported that the buildings would only be utilized for storage. He did state that water would be to <br />the site but not utilized for sprinkling the building as it would be a dry-system. <br /> <br />Mayor Love asked whether the easement for the trail would be an issue for heavy delivery trucks <br />and the impact it would have on the asphalt. Administrator Statz stated that the trail was built to <br />hand such traffic and that no impacts were anticipated. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Wilharber, seconded by Council Member Koski to Approve the <br />Revised Conditional Use Permit for Centerville Storage, Including the Revised Site Plan as <br />Submitted. A roll-call vote was taken. Mayor Love and Council Members Koski, Lakso, <br />Montain & Wilharber voted in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />3. City Hall Renovation – Council Chambers Layout Review <br /> <br />City Administrator stated that he had contained several presentations that were the preliminary <br />layout of the proposed Council Chambers. He stated that they showed seating, the Council dais, <br />emphasis on the wall behind Council Members, and glass entry doors for visibility. He also stated <br />that video screens would be on the north and south walls rather than the east wall which would be <br />the history wall. <br /> <br />Council Member Wilharber questioned exit doors and Administrator Statz stated that one (1) door <br />would exit to the outdoors and another would exit through Administrative Offices. <br /> <br />Council Member Koski suggested that the dais be curved allowing for view of members of Council <br />and a feeling of not being cramped. Discussion regarding additional room for the dais would <br />reduce audience participation for seating and additional costs. Council Member Lakso stated that <br />she liked a lot of the features that were incorporated in the preliminary layout and asked about <br />lighting. Administrator Statz stated that the new design would incorporate the existing coving <br />with the remaining fourth wall being involved, he also felt that LED fixtures would be utilized. <br />Mayor Love stated that he is excited for the renovation as it has been needed for quite some time. <br />He stated that he desired for employees to have the ability to complete their duties without <br />difficulty. Brief discussion was had regarding the audio/video equipment and City Administrator <br />Statz stated that the preferred vendor has been included in discussions. Mayor Love asked about <br />construction timeframe. Administrator Statz stated late June or early July with construction during <br />the fall. Mayor Love questioned the updating of the HVAC system as warm days would be coming <br />shortly. Administrator Statz stated that this would be incorporated in the project and would be <br />completed at the same time as all other construction. <br /> <br />City Administrator Statz stated that he was not looking for Council to make a motion but desired <br />to update them on the progress and take input. Mayor Love stated that Administrator Statz was <br />previously directed to make decisions regarding the project and consensus of Council was to allow <br />that same direction going forward. <br /> <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.